Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Scientist Vote
IBD Editorials ^ | October 11, 2010 | Investors Business Daily staff

Posted on 10/11/2010 5:24:29 PM PDT by Kaslin

Conformity: "Vote Democrat," says a meteorologist and noted global warming proponent. But Democrats won't be getting the vote of the esteemed physicist who just resigned from a scientific body for silencing debate.

Michael Mann, director of the Penn State Earth System Science Center, took to the pages of the Washington Post Friday to say that while "as a scientist, I shouldn't have a stake in the upcoming midterm elections," he regretted to announce that "unfortunately, it seems that I — and indeed all my fellow climate scientists — do."

Mann warns that Republicans would launch "a hostile investigation of climate science." But investigation is, in fact, warranted.

Harold Lewis, physics professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara, has been a member of the American Physical Society, the second-largest association of physicists in the world, for 67 years — most of the organization's existence. A couple of days before Mann's piece appeared, Lewis tendered his resignation.

Meteorologist Anthony Watts called it "an important moment in science history ... on the scale of Martin Luther nailing his 95 theses to the Wittenberg church door." (Boasting a 10-kilowatt array that powers his home and driving an electric-powered Ford TH!NK, Watts can't be called a right-wing anti-environmentalist.)

Lewis is neither a lightweight nor a crank. A student of father-of -the-bomb J. Robert Oppenheimer, he studied at Berkeley and Princeton, worked at Bell Labs and advised the U.S. government on nuclear safety.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/11/2010 5:24:30 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Science really went downhill since some became “concerned”.


2 posted on 10/11/2010 5:33:44 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Mann warns that Republicans would launch "a hostile investigation of climate science." "

Dear Michael: There is no "Climate Science". You guys can't tell much about the past nor accurately predict the future.

3 posted on 10/11/2010 5:36:08 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Mann warns that Republicans would launch "a hostile investigation of climate science

Good, I want this AGW crap debunked as soon as possible, too soon coming!

It'll lower all our utility bills that these shysters have jacked-up recently!

4 posted on 10/11/2010 5:38:33 PM PDT by PROCON (22 More Days Until Independence Day, Woo-Hoo!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Michael Mann.... You mean “Hockey Stick” Mann, the so-called scientist that falsified data and conveniently forgot the existence of the “little ice age” ?

That Mann?

His opinion is worth nothing. Even less.


5 posted on 10/11/2010 6:06:45 PM PDT by Drammach (Freedom - It's not just a job, It's an Adventure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Mann warns that Republicans would launch “a hostile investigation of climate science.”

Paging Congressman Issa, Please pick up the Red phone.


6 posted on 10/11/2010 6:07:56 PM PDT by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
...Republicans would launch "a hostile investigation of climate science."

I think he really means AGW fraud, when he says "climate science".

7 posted on 10/11/2010 6:11:37 PM PDT by 3niner (When Obama succeeds, America fails.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Republicans would launch "a hostile investigation of climate science

Damn straight!!

8 posted on 10/11/2010 6:14:26 PM PDT by Traveler59 (Truth is a journey, not a destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Left-wing “progressive” disinformation screams that government-supported research is pristine, with no strings or motives attached, while privately-funded research is somehow suspect, with impure motives. What a baseless lie. What bullsh!t. Real scientists would do well to divorce themselves from the deranged progressive ideology which purports to respect science, but is actually undermining the foundations of science itself.


9 posted on 10/11/2010 6:27:32 PM PDT by TimSkalaBim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

....a hostile investigation of climate science.

a hostile investigation of junk science. (fixed it)


10 posted on 10/11/2010 6:35:31 PM PDT by DarthVader (That which supports Barack Hussein Obama must be sterilized and there are NO exceptions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Hostile??? As in truthful and factual including all influences such as the Sun? Hostile?? As in not taking a gas (CO2) that is even isn't listed in the top 10 of gases that make up the atmosphere and give it undue importance? Hostile as in making any claim be justified by the scientific method and not consensus?
Yep. We are a hostile bunch of Neanderthals.
11 posted on 10/11/2010 6:52:16 PM PDT by cashless (Unlike Obama and his supporters, I'd rather be a TEA BAGGER than a TEA BAGGEE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Mann warns that Republicans would launch "a hostile investigation of climate science."

Hostile investigation? Ask Galileo what a 'hostile investigation' is. A REAL scientist would welcome investigations of his data.

I guess this answers "what's the difference between a scientist and an engineer"? Scientists vote for Democrats, and real engineers vote for Republicans.

12 posted on 10/11/2010 7:13:04 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Science really went downhill since some became “concerned”.

Excellent post! Anyone who has been paying attention now trusts "scientists" as much he trusts Congressmen.

13 posted on 10/12/2010 5:27:51 AM PDT by Tax-chick (You could be a monthly donor, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson