There appears to be a serious problem with that image. I saw it on another forum and reposted it here, but here and elsewhere people are questioning whether it was a deliberately misleading conflation of two or more separate court documents. I cannot vouch for its authenticity, and I know nothing about the website where the image was hosted.
The image is a combination of two Documents. It may have been done innocently thinking that since the first document ended with #6 the item #7 was part of it. Whatever the motivation, the items are part of two documents as shown by the exhibits at the Oath Keeper’s site.