[668 - Neighbor of the Beast]

This kind of story is geared to getting us worked up, folks. I’m not even going to read about it anymore. Maybe the father’s abusive, maybe the family’s dysfunctional, I don’t know, and I don’t trust any journalist to tell me the straight facts.

That said, if I were the judge in this case, I wouldn’t even allow an affidavit in the record that mentioned the father’s assoc with Oath Keepers. It shouldn’t be in there.

For the record, some of the lowest opinions I have EVER had, are of CPS and their ilk. Only in the most extraordinary circumstances should any govt entity be taking someone’s children away.

[Sopater]

This kind of story is geared to getting us worked up, folks. I’m not even going to read about it anymore.

That's what I initially thought when I saw it on WND, but when I saw that it was confirmed on the Oath Keeper's website, I thought I'd go ahead and post it. I certainly hope that Oath Keepers (OK) can distance themselves from this guy based on his past, but the story says that the court relied on his association with OK to take the baby, calling OK a "malitia". The affidavit is rediculous.