[Brian Kopp DPM]

[Anti-Bubba182]

That image is a combination of two documents: http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2010/10/11/confirmed-court-did-rely-on-oath-keeper-association-to-take-baby/ "...There has been some confusion about this case, leading some commentators to believe that the reference to John Irish’s “association” with Oath Keepers was in some other document, rather than in the affidavit relied on by the Court’s Order. Alex Jones’ site, in an effort to protect the privacy of the family, posted excerpts from two different documents, leading some to question where the reference actually was.

To clear that up, below you will find an embedded PDF which contains the full (though redacted) versions of the following documents: the two Petitions (one pertaining to each parent), the Court’s Ex Parte Order, the Affidavit of Dana Bickford which was attached, the Motion for Change of Venue, and lastly, the Notice to Accused Parent, explaining the legal process. We have highlighted in yellow all text where the Petitions or the Court Order refers to the Affidavit which contains reference to Oath Keepers.

By looking at the below documents, you will be able to see from the two Petitions, the Order, and Affidavit item #7, in that order, that:..."

[Raycpa]

I suggest everyone take another look at this document. At the end of each point numbers 1-5 there is a semicolon which indicates the sentence is continuing until we get to number 6 which ends in a period.

Together with the fact the item 7 looks pasted in and item 6 ends the sentence, I would be very skeptical that 7 is in the original.

[Fundamentally Fair]

Why does point 7 appear to have a different font?