[freedomwarrior998]

So the affidavit lists eleven distinct paragraphs to support the complaint, 9 of these paragraphs are redacted, and we are told they are "private" and "not-relevant" and we are supposed to believe that ONLY paragraph 7 is the reason that the children were taken away?

Really now?

When an un-redacted copy of the affidavit is shown, then I might believe the "OH NOEZ CONSPIWACY" claims. Until those paragraphs are shown, I have no reason to believe any of these assertions.

[Balding_Eagle]

More to the point, we also blacked out the parts unrelated to Oath Keepers and to gun ownership because my focus in this case is on the illegitimate listing of a father’s political affiliations and his gun ownership as a reason to take his daughter away from him and also away from her mother.

[freedomwarrior998]

Apparently, the redacted paragraphs that we are not supposed to see, have extremely damaging and serious allegations.

http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/219670/couple-state-took-our-baby

http://reason.com/blog/2010/10/08/baby-snatching-its-hilarious-w