[little jeremiah]

As the old saw goes, “Two wrongs don’t make a right”.

The nazi-esque forcing of the homosexual agenda is much more reprehensible that a bunch of hoodlums getting a bit rowdy.

Sure, those guys were over the line, they should have behaved themselves better. But calling them “clero-facsists” (I think that was the term, I realize you didn’t use it) paints every opponent of the homosexual agenda with the “thug” brush, which is loaded and a lie.

The homosexual agenda is meant to destroy the natural family, marriage, children’s innocence, the freedoms of speech, religion and association, the military, and requires a huge Nanny State to enforce on the generally very unwilling population. So, it is much more dangerous - exponentially so - than a handful of hooligans. And it would be interesting to read a non-MSM report of what went down at that protest.

[Ultra Sonic 007]

But calling them “clero-facsists” (I think that was the term, I realize you didn’t use it) paints every opponent of the homosexual agenda with the “thug” brush, which is loaded and a lie.

I wasn't supporting mainsail's use of that term either. What I am saying is that the protesters were in the wrong to firebomb the police.