Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reid Voted Against Law Enforcement, Supported the Rights of Illegal Aliens
Breitbart ^ | October 8, 2010

Posted on 10/08/2010 1:01:38 PM PDT by Southnsoul

LAS VEGAS, Oct. 8 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ --1001 Reasons to Vote Against Harry Reid, an independent committee, has uncovered yet another vote Sen. Harry Reid would probably rather forget. On June 14, 1984 there was a vote on Amendment 18 to H.R. 1510, the Immigration Reform and Control Act. The Amendment, which would have struck section 114, would have changed the law to require INS officers searching for illegal aliens to obtain a search warrant before searching an open field.

This commonsense measure had the support of Members of Congress from across the board, from Rep. Henry Hyde (R-IL) to Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA).

"Back in the day, Rep. Harry Reid voted against a measure to help the INS deal with the serious problem of illegal immigration, based on Supreme Court cases upholding the 4th Amendment, such as Hester v. United States, Katz v. United States and Oliver v. United States. It should be noted that his position put him to the left of Rep. Barney Frank, one of the most liberal Members of Congress, who stated at the time that the amendment threatened the sanctity of the search warrant. It is ironic that the Sen. Reid we know today used his position as Majority Leader to stall a vote on a comprehensive immigration bill that dealt with illegal aliens and the responsibilities of the INS or other law enforcement agencies. I guess he doesn't want to tie their hands while he's courting their support in his re-election," said Audrey Mullen, a spokeswoman for the Committee.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: aliens; nevada

1 posted on 10/08/2010 1:01:40 PM PDT by Southnsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Southnsoul

His son will do exactly the same thing.


2 posted on 10/08/2010 1:03:45 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southnsoul

Nothing new here...move along. He is what he is...and should be voted out of public offices forever.


3 posted on 10/08/2010 1:07:36 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southnsoul; 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; ...

Ping!


4 posted on 10/08/2010 4:02:04 PM PDT by HiJinx (I can see November from my front porch - and Mexico from the back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2

I agree.


5 posted on 10/09/2010 7:51:44 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...
Thanks Southnsoul.
The Amendment, which would have struck section 114, would have changed the law to require INS officers searching for illegal aliens to obtain a search warrant before searching an open field.

6 posted on 10/09/2010 11:12:31 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Reid is a doddering fool.


7 posted on 10/09/2010 12:16:22 PM PDT by TheOldLady (Pablo is very wily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson