Did you even read the article? Stop coming up with Bad critiques! Its disingenuous to keep calling out the liberals for idiots that they in fact are, but act the Same! We. Are. Better. So act like it! The article says :
“That would save a typical household $2,300 on its electricity bill....”
and then
“But the White House is far from a typical house...”
Can I say, No s**t Sherlock? As I noted before, if the WH’s annual electricity Bill is anything less than $100,000, I would be absolutely stunned...Solar power is way too expensive for an Average house, but for the WH, who knows? Maybe, it does bring down the electric bill or maybe (more likely) it doesn’t but we need to know the actual numbers before we sound off. Good arguments are a habit you know...
Well -
We don’t need to know the exact numbers - for two reasons -
1. Many of us have run the calculations. You see the results in these posts. Solar don’t pay - even with good sun, in high electric cost areas, with 65% government subsidy. On large installations.
Whether the WH uses $2K or $4K or $100K per year makes no difference - it is the cost/KWHr that drives the equation.
Anotehr way to tell? See all of those provate business NOT putting up soalr? If it paid - even with the subsidies that the WH can’t get - more places would have solar.
majority of solar are government buildings - or CA - where they made a mistake with the kickback, and give rebates too large.
Whatever you say, milord. I’ll run all my comments past you in future before posting them.