I hope you didn't get that idea based on my comments. It sure isn't what I mean to convey.
Most of this info I had the day after he was killed.
I'm not convinced that Mr. Scott was 'impaired' in his ability to go shopping and act like a responsible, gun carrying citizen.
IF he was as bad as the INQUEST implies, then I would question why anyone allowed him to go to the store, or why anyone allowed him to stay once he entered.
In other words, I am trying to be as open-minded about the possibilities as I can.
Unfortunately the KEY pieces of evidence are being withheld from the public. I can accept that if the evidence is only withheld pending a court case.
BUT, that is not the case.
Yes the evidence is being withheld and that is a problem. I think the impared story is just a way to smear him and is just a story and is not based upon facts. The way Costco, the police, DA and Coroner have handled this raised many questions in my mind. I do not trust the government in this case.
That is not to say that I totally believe the family either, but the family does not have the power of the gun, like the goevernment does, to force what they want to happen.