Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kiryandil
I would assume that it was loaded.

Me too.

However, if I accused the guy of attempted murder, and it was found that the gun wasn't loaded, how would that stand up in court?

Since we've agreed that the cops couldn't read minds, how should they react to the threat of the loaded gun?

Would I still get to speculate in court WITHOUT REBUTTAL that the guy "could have shot through his holster"

We've got one of those 20/20 hindsight things going on here.

244 posted on 10/07/2010 10:58:19 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot
We've got one of those 20/20 hindsight things going on here

Yes - the 20/20 hindsight thing where Officer Mosher said at the inquest that he owns the same type of holster, and the gun could be “easily fired” while in its holster.

Without being challenged.

BTW - I'm still waiting for you to point out the post where "Some here claim that if no round was chambered, the cops should have known that before they fired."...

247 posted on 10/07/2010 11:20:44 AM PDT by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson