So, the police should get to use the mere fact that he had a gun to assert that he could have shot through his holster, and taken innocent people hostage, even with an unloaded gun.
I thought we agreed they couldn't read his mind and couldn't tell if the gun was loaded?
245 posted on 10/07/2010 11:00:46 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot
(Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)