Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel
I'm sorry, but you really are making a wrong point on this one. No defendent ever submits anything until requested/directed by the Court to do so. Courts don't even want such submittals from the defense before basic procedural issues are cleared.

Obama could have submitted a birth certificate to each of the seventy-some trials to date, and no Court would have even attempted to validate it. The dismissals would have been issued on the exact same procedural grounds; they don't just jump over that to answer questions they aren't even legally asked yet.

90 posted on 10/04/2010 2:07:53 PM PDT by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: tired_old_conservative
I'm sorry, but you really are making a wrong point on this one. No defendent ever submits anything until requested/directed by the Court to do so. Courts don't even want such submittals from the defense before basic procedural issues are cleared.

I'm sorry my points are right on CON. We see a silly "president" who can't even prove he was born in Hawaii. Nope, we have a proven liar-in-chief who can't show a mere birth certificate in court. He has the exculpatory evidence at the tip of his finger but won't produce it for the court. It's certainly not evidence that will hurt him in court as it should clear his name to where he was born. You don't keep exculpatory evidence out of numerous courts for over 2 years if it clears your name.

91 posted on 10/04/2010 2:17:46 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson