Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777

Is it your belief that since obama has managed to block all lawsuits against him ,he must be a natural born citizen? No judge has found him ineligible because no case has got past the standing issue. If a thief beats a rap by having a good attorney does not mean he is not guilty? For over 200 years the accepted definition for Natural Born citizen has been “born of parents who are U.S. citizens”* why should we change it just so obama can play “president”
* Minor vs. Happensett, U.S. Supreme Court.


124 posted on 10/05/2010 5:02:50 PM PDT by omegadawn (qualified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: omegadawn

Is it your belief that since obama has managed to block all lawsuits against him ,he must be a natural born citizen? No judge has found him ineligible because no case has got past the standing issue. If a thief beats a rap by having a good attorney does not mean he is not guilty? For over 200 years the accepted definition for Natural Born citizen has been “born of parents who are U.S. citizens”* why should we change it just so obama can play “president”
* Minor vs. Happensett, U.S. Supreme Court.


No that is not my belief. I believe Obama to be a natural born citizen because officials of the state of Hawai’i who have actually seen his vital records have declared him to be a natural born citizen and judges and justices who have reviewed legal briefs submitted by many defendants in many civil suits have also declared him to be a natural born citizen. Many of the lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility don’t even name Obama as a defendant so he did nothing to block them and that includes lawsuits that have gone all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States.
It isn’t Obama’s fault that plaintiffs’ attorneys have failed to produce a plaintiff that would be granted standing to file suit on Obama’s eligibility.

For a few examples: Ankeny v The Governor of Indiana, Lightfoot v Bowen, Beverly v FEC, Craig v US, Donofrio v Wells, Rhodes v MacDonald, Schneller v Cortes, Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz, U.S. v Lakin, or Martin v Lingle.

Fraud and election fraud are CRIMES. There are no issues of standing in the criminal justice system. If there is evidence of a crime having been committed, a prosecutor indicts the alleged perpetrator.
Nixon got in trouble over Watergate. Indictments were handed down.
Reagan got in trouble over Iran-Contra. Criminal indictments were handed down.
Clinton got in trouble over Whitewater. Criminal indictments were handed down.
Bush got in trouble over the CIA leaks and the Valerie Plame affair, criminal indictments were handed down.
Where are the criminal indictments for Obama-gate, naturalborn-gate and certifi-gate.


126 posted on 10/05/2010 8:48:46 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson