Is it your belief that since obama has managed to block all lawsuits against him ,he must be a natural born citizen? No judge has found him ineligible because no case has got past the standing issue. If a thief beats a rap by having a good attorney does not mean he is not guilty? For over 200 years the accepted definition for Natural Born citizen has been “born of parents who are U.S. citizens”* why should we change it just so obama can play “president”
* Minor vs. Happensett, U.S. Supreme Court.
Is it your belief that since obama has managed to block all lawsuits against him ,he must be a natural born citizen? No judge has found him ineligible because no case has got past the standing issue. If a thief beats a rap by having a good attorney does not mean he is not guilty? For over 200 years the accepted definition for Natural Born citizen has been born of parents who are U.S. citizens* why should we change it just so obama can play president
* Minor vs. Happensett, U.S. Supreme Court.
For a few examples: Ankeny v The Governor of Indiana, Lightfoot v Bowen, Beverly v FEC, Craig v US, Donofrio v Wells, Rhodes v MacDonald, Schneller v Cortes, Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz, U.S. v Lakin, or Martin v Lingle.
Fraud and election fraud are CRIMES. There are no issues of standing in the criminal justice system. If there is evidence of a crime having been committed, a prosecutor indicts the alleged perpetrator.
Nixon got in trouble over Watergate. Indictments were handed down.
Reagan got in trouble over Iran-Contra. Criminal indictments were handed down.
Clinton got in trouble over Whitewater. Criminal indictments were handed down.
Bush got in trouble over the CIA leaks and the Valerie Plame affair, criminal indictments were handed down.
Where are the criminal indictments for Obama-gate, naturalborn-gate and certifi-gate.