Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Movement of the Moment (Tea Party) Looks to Long-Ago Texts
New York Times ^ | October 1, 2010 | KATE ZERNIKE

Posted on 10/02/2010 4:52:11 AM PDT by reaganaut1

The Tea Party is a thoroughly modern movement, organizing on Twitter and Facebook to become the most dynamic force of the midterm elections.

But when it comes to ideology, it has reached back to dusty bookshelves for long-dormant ideas.

It has resurrected once-obscure texts by dead writers — in some cases elevating them to best-seller status — to form a kind of Tea Party canon. Recommended by Tea Party icons like Ron Paul and Glenn Beck, the texts are being quoted everywhere from protest signs to Republican Party platforms.

Pamphlets in the Tea Party bid for a Second American Revolution, the works include Frédéric Bastiat’s “The Law,” published in 1850, which proclaimed that taxing people to pay for schools or roads was government-sanctioned theft, and Friedrich Hayek’s “Road to Serfdom” (1944), which argued that a government that intervened in the economy would inevitably intervene in every aspect of its citizens’ lives.

The relative newcomer is “The 5000 Year Leap,” self-published in 1981 by an anti-communist crusader shunned by his fellow Mormons for his more controversial positions, including a hearty defense of the John Birch Society. It asserts that the Founding Fathers had not intended separation of church and state, and would have considered taxes to provide for the welfare of others “a sin.”

If their arguments can be out there (like getting rid of the 17th Amendment, which established the direct election of senators by popular vote) or out of date (Bastiat warned that if government taxed wine and tobacco, “beggars and vagabonds will demand the right to vote”), the works have provided intellectual ballast for a segment of the electorate angry or frustrated about the economy and the growing reach of government.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bastiat; hayek; roadtoserfdom; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Three of the books mentioned are

"The Law", by Frédéric Bastiat

"The Road to Serfdom", by Friedrich Hayek

“The 5000 Year Leap", by W. Cleon Skousen

1 posted on 10/02/2010 4:52:13 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Primary source documents.

Many of the links are dead but this site is a good place to get names for further searches. Lots of interesting stuff to be found. Testimony of Ben Franklin before parliment about his predictions for what would happen if Great Britain applied more pressure. Text of the tea act of 1773.

http://www.constitution.org/primarysources/primarysources.html#bc


2 posted on 10/02/2010 4:57:33 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Obscure ideas?, Eh, Kate.

The brief paraphrases you selected certainly have a charm to them. especially taking money from some to give to others as theft. And after passing through the kidneys of government to fatten our imperial masters, the improvident are subsidized in their poverty.


3 posted on 10/02/2010 5:01:03 AM PDT by plangent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
But when it comes to ideology, it has reached back to dusty bookshelves for long-dormant ideas. It has resurrected once-obscure texts by dead writers

Doesn't that just sum up the entire thesis of this "so-called" journolist? What a shining example of what the public school system and leftist professors are teaching these days. Far better to be dead and brilliant for your time than to be brain dead and clueless while still breathing.

4 posted on 10/02/2010 5:06:42 AM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio - US Senate, West FL22nd, Scott/Carroll - FL Gov/LtGov, Miller-AK US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The Tea Party Movement is the fastest growing political anti big government movement in American history and its momentum is not abating it is increasing and thank God for it.

The Tea Party has its roots in the Constitution of the US and the founding principles of the heroes of the American Revolutionary War as written in the Declaration of Independence and then the US Constitution.


5 posted on 10/02/2010 5:06:42 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

A bizarre article, even for the NYT: For example, putting terms like “the rule of law” in quotation marks, as if it were some oddball concept.


6 posted on 10/02/2010 5:08:21 AM PDT by denydenydeny ("Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." Thomas Mann)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

So does the writer have a problem with going back to Americas roots? If your tree is dying, you find the problem and treat it.


7 posted on 10/02/2010 5:08:55 AM PDT by beckysueb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

THE NEW FILM “BATTLE FOR AMERICA” WITH DICK MORRIS

ORDER “BATTLE FOR AMERICA” THE NEW CITIZENS UNITED FILM WITH DICK MORRIS

Dear Subscriber,

I’ve teamed up with Citizens United, Newt Gingrich, Ann Coulter, Fred Barnes and a bunch of other good people to do a film entitled Battle for America. It is the ultimate weapon for the 2010 elections!

It lays out the case against Obama, Reid and Pelosi and how America hangs in the balance during this coming election. It has become a staple at Tea Party events and is achieving iconic status as the ultimate statement of what is at stake this November.

It is fast paced, lively, creative, entertaining and very, very compelling.

Please order it today and arrange for your friends and family to see it. It is the WMD of this election! It will persuade anybody within reach to vote Obama’s puppets out of office. And they’ll drive through a wall to get to the polls to vote for this change!

Click here to watch the trailer!

Click here to order the film!

I just spoke at a Tea Party event in Orlando and we sold 300 copies in about half an hour! People were buying the film for their friends and neighbors.

When you go hunting, you arm yourself. When you go hunting for votes, you need to arm yourself with this movie!

Get it right now!!!!!

Thanks and keep the faith,

Dick Morris

AS THE ELECTION APPROACHES, WE ARE TRYING TO EXPAND THE E-MAIL REACH OF THESE COLUMNS. PLEASE FORWARD THIS EMAIL TO YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY
THANK YOU!


8 posted on 10/02/2010 5:11:23 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Well of course the Founders organized the federal government under the auspices of Natural Law. Why? Because Natural Law is controlled by Nature, not by Man.

It's the main reason the feds get their knickers in a knot... they have NO authority or ability alter it's established precepts!

-----

If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave.
John Adams, Rights of the Colonists, 1772

That these are our grievances which we have thus laid before his majesty, with that freedom of language and sentiment which becomes a free people claiming their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate.
Thomas Jefferson, Rights of British America, 1774

9 posted on 10/02/2010 5:14:51 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a Person as created by the Law of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The daily propaganda from the left.

Written in a really weird style - it is sort of accusatory -

“Intended for the Bible to be taught in school” - ... expecting the reader - well educated by the modern left - to pull back in horror. Never mind that teaching the Bible in school was THE LAW in many states at the time of the revolution.

The next sentence - could add clarity - such as “of course that was the law back then” or even the were “those were difference times”.

It is kind of funny - the author quotes many things, but never addresses any facts head on. That is the weirdness. it assumes a point of view - and lack of education - of the reader.


10 posted on 10/02/2010 5:24:02 AM PDT by Eldon Tyrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eldon Tyrell
“What students would learn in American schools above all is the religion of Jesus Christ.”

George Washington. [speech to the Delaware Indian Chiefs May 12, 1779]
11 posted on 10/02/2010 5:26:47 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eldon Tyrell

When it comes to the Bible vs Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, I will take the Bible every time.


12 posted on 10/02/2010 5:30:49 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1; Alamo-Girl; betty boop
The article left out one of the most important tomes, The Christian Life and Character of the Civil Institutions of the United States.

Published originally by Benjamin Morris in 1864 and available now through American Vision in an issue republished in 2007.

This book destroys any argument that tries to portray the founders and the century leading up to the writing of the Constitution as anything other than profoundly and deeply Christian.

While it was not the purpose of the founders to make the Constitution a religious manifesto they deliberately instilled into the Constitution principles that were central to the Christian world view. The most important such principle is that the powers of the government are derived from the people, not the inverse.

The Declaration of Independence serves as the template for the Constitution. That first document is visibly Christian.

There is no sense in which the founders intended that the Constitution depart from the ideas and principles of the Declaration. "The Christian Life..." makes that case with stunning clarity.

13 posted on 10/02/2010 5:32:19 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (They are the vultures of Dark Crystal screeeching their hatred and fear into the void ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amos the Prophet

Indeed. Thank you for sharing your insights, dear Amos the Prophet!


14 posted on 10/02/2010 5:40:43 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Amos the Prophet

Absolutely correct.

The Judeo-Christian foundation of our country is directly attributable to its founders as well as the heroes of our American Revolution against the tyranny of the British government.

That foundation, as established in the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution, was divinely inspired by the spirit and the faith of those men and women - just like the Bible was divinely inspired to be written by those who witnessed history.


15 posted on 10/02/2010 5:44:00 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Amos the Prophet
“It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible.”

George Washington.
16 posted on 10/02/2010 5:44:59 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The old ways of America were the Christian-Judeo ethics ways and since God the Father of Israel (Elohim) exists and His only begotten son Jesus Christ is Lord , the Word of God will always hold true.
The ways of the Lord are right ways, the just shall live in them.


17 posted on 10/02/2010 5:51:25 AM PDT by kindred (Come, Lord Jesus, rule and reign over all thine enemies from Zion, the chosen nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The NYT has no problem shilling for long-dead writers like Marx, Mao, Stalin and Hitler.

If the NYT had its way, those four faces would be on Mt. Rushmore.


18 posted on 10/02/2010 5:52:38 AM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Like Captain Ahab on the back of the stricken white whale, the leftists cling tenaciously to their dogma that freedom and ecoinomic incentives are no longer necessary to generate prosperity. History has clearly demonstrated that the only alternative is the whip and chains, but the libs insist that the past will not be repeated and this time we’ll “get it right”. They’re in complete denial.


19 posted on 10/02/2010 5:59:17 AM PDT by Spok (Is it RINO season yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny
No, the NY Times doesn't consider the "rule of law" an oddball concept, they consider it a "long dormant idea". An idea, the Times had hoped they had killed once and for all. Which reminds me, what has the Times reported about to Dept of Justice lawyers reporting that it is Dept of Justice policy not to bring voter rights cases based on race? "If perps are Black, do not attack. If vics are White, do not bite."

It's that ol' "rule of law thing".

20 posted on 10/02/2010 6:10:07 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Are they insane, stupid or just evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson