A lot of these types of EEO cases just get settled. Its usually what the judges want too. So unless Murdoch wants to make a big scene out of this it will likely be quietly processed and the woman and her lawyers will line their pockets with green.
But it would be very interesting if Fox decides to fight it out.
In a sane society when you have an employee who makes a complaint that is found to be without merit, and disruptive to morale, you would have a right to insist the person "cease and desist" from future frivolous claims as a condition of employment. When did employers lose the right to insist their employees not be disruptive to their operations?