Of the two candidates he was clearly the better one.
He was upset for a good reason.
He was asked to back up an accusation he made and he flew off the handle.
Perhaps instead of slandering FReepers
Which FReeper did I slander? Cite the post.
and shilling for the opposition you could accept things the way they are.
If I were "shilling for the opposition" I would be championing Paladino's new foray into discussing Cuomo's personal life.
I would be saying: "Forget the issues! Don't take Cuomo to task on his mismanangement of HUD! Don't look into his biased and selective actions as state AG! Focus on Cuomo's personal life! That's the winning strategy!"
I posted this thread specifically to point out that this is a losing proposition for Paladino. New Yorkers will overlook personal flaws if you can get them excited about lower taxes, more jobs and less wasteful spending.
That was untrue and lowdown. I never see anyone around here advocate stalking a kid for political reasons.
Sounds to me like Paladino and his wife had a tragedy, a loss of a child. Many times after something like that marriages have problems. That doesn't make the man a dirtbag. Obviously his family has worked it out and reunited while accepting this child. That is something to be respected.
If this reporter had offered a rundown of the shenanigans of Cuomo along with his Paladino story, it wouldn't be as big a deal. I heard the reporter. He did not deny that he had never written a bad story on Cuomo.
This guy was out to exploit Paladino’s daughter and their situation to help Cuomo. Why? Because that is the person who gains from the story.
I don't care how high and mighty this Dicker fellow claims to be. He wasn't being even handed.
He may not have been behind the camera man going to the child's window, but the camera man was there because of him.
This is typical democrat sleaze antics. Nobody cranks out lowlife sludge like the democrats and their whore media.