Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: x

“Some parts of the country are so densely populated that public transportation makes sense.”

Those parts already have mass transit.

“I’d certainly be opposed to somebody taking away cars or confiscating rural property,”

They won’t ‘confiscate’ them, they’ll just be so expensive only the elite will be able to afford a private car.


30 posted on 09/29/2010 5:53:28 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver
Those parts already have mass transit.

And other parts of the country will never become so crowded that mass transit becomes an real option?

That's what Los Angeles thought not so long ago.

Even if you love to drive, would it be a bad idea to let others take the train?

More room on the highway for you.

31 posted on 09/29/2010 5:57:03 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: driftdiver
they’ll just be so expensive only the elite will be able to afford a private car.

Which is really the point, isolate freedoms to just be accessible to the noble classes. People call it socialism, but I am leaning more towards calling it Feudalism.

32 posted on 09/29/2010 5:57:34 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson