Replies

LOL. If only it was that easy. Shooting the messenger won’t change facts though. She’s unelectable.

Stop your nonsense already.

You might as well be working for the opposition camp.

And, that crap about "shooting the messenger" is not what people are doing when they're calling you out on your duplicity.

You call yourself "the messenger", but if you don't like the message, why propagate it unless you want the opposition to win? Look, when the opposition is having a hard time or even an easy time, why should you be helping them in anyway at all?

You, as the "messenger" are just as harmful as the message itself. Oftentimes, the messenger can't be separated from the message. If you don't believe in the message, let it do whatever harm if might cause without you having to help it along. In fact, instead of allowing the message to exert its harm, why not try to bring forth a contrary message to prevent its harm?

Furthermore, the facts are not what you want others to believe. The "facts" to you are not the reality on the ground. Your statement that she's "unelectable" is something that the enemy will be glad to hear from the opposing camp. With your message, you become the enabler for the opposition.

BTW, Obama was very unelectable back in 2006. Remember? He had many times the negatives going for him than O'Donnel does at the moment. Obama was NEVER going to win, yet, who's the president now?

Be realistic. There’s absolutely, positively no way that anything I say on this forum would change any Freepers mind and cause them to vote for Coons over O’Donnell assuming they are from Deleware. So anything I say about O’Donnell’s unelectability won’t cause her a scintilla of harm since I don’t go around shilling for Coons. What the hell do you take me for? I’m just expressing my opinion (yep, I’ve got one of those too) that she’s not going to be elected. I’ll see you back on one of these threads after the Republicans kick down the House door and maybe the Senate door and we’ll compare notes.