>So much for your keen observational skills and resume.
I never cited my keen observational skills; and never commented on the content itself as I did not have access to the stream/video.
All I did was observe that if the testimony were ‘scrambled’ (the events recounted being disjoint) it could be that the witness said one thing [implying that it happened earlier or later] and then later clarified that statement to revise the time to some other point; this can be a common occurrence when there is a significant gap/break in the presentation of the events.
I was referring to sf boy’s post about this keen observational skills. I only copied you because you suggested that we may both be right.