Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ltc8k6
OK then, back to the beginning. Since you believe that the officers had a legal basis to demand identification pursuant to the statute, please articulate the basis the officers had to reasonably suspect that these gentlemen were committing or were about to commit a crime.

When answering the question, please keep in mind that the officer stated he was checking to see if they were felons. What specific information can you cite to support a reasonable suspicion that these gentlemen were felons?

If you believe that the officers' suspicion under the statute may have arisen from actions constituting disorderly conduct, please identify the conduct that would give an officer reasonable suspicion that these gentlemen were acting disorderly. Please keep in mind that lawful conduct, such as carrying a firearm, with nothing further cannot be the basis for a disorderly conduct charge. See Racine.

243 posted on 09/23/2010 9:37:28 AM PDT by grady ("Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading." - Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]


To: grady

Calm down, man. This is just an informal discussion board. It’s not that important.

The minute third degree questioning to show that I may be wrong is way overboard.

I’ve been wrong before. It’s no big deal if I am wrong again.

The world won’t end or anyhting if I am wrong, and you won’t be rewarded for proving it.


257 posted on 09/23/2010 10:34:28 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson