You stated that they were well within clear meaning of the statute in asking for ID. You previously said you didn't like the law, but the officers were acting within it's limits. This entire debate has been about trying to get you to articulate what crime the officers may have thought was being committed. You never identified any basis for such a suspicion. We have been inquiring as to why, in the absence of such suspicion, you would opine that the police were acting within the scope of the statute.
Are you now saying that they were not acting within the scope of the statute?