Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ltc8k6; grady
They don’t need an actual crime. They need to reasonably be suspicious of what might have been going on.

No, the LAW states that the officer must "...reasonably suspect(s) that such person is committing, is about to commit or has committed a crime...". You and others in this thread have been dishonestly stonewalling and evading answering the simple question "what crime did the cops have a reasonable basis to suspect was going to be committed or had been committed?"

The law in WI is pretty clear and has a wide leeway for the officers.

The law is clear - it's your reading comprehension and ability to employ logic that is in error. If this wasn't a such a serious issue your illogical rationalizations would be comical. It is ironic that you can't even understand that the actual language of the law you cite refutes your argument.

158 posted on 09/23/2010 7:58:15 AM PDT by tarheelswamprat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: tarheelswamprat

“We had two people that reported to police that they felt uncomfortable, felt there was a disturbance,” Madison Police Chief Noble Wray said. “They felt uneasy about the circumstances of what was taking place there.”

Two complaints...


160 posted on 09/23/2010 8:01:12 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

To: tarheelswamprat

I don’t have discussions with folks who cannot keep it civil.

Have a nice day.


161 posted on 09/23/2010 8:03:25 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson