Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: penelopesire

From an article on Drudge: “A classified exercise in May showed that the government was woefully unprepared to deal with a nuclear terrorist attack in the United States. The scenario involved the detonation of a small, crude nuclear weapon in Indianapolis and the simultaneous threat of a second blast in Los Angeles. Obama, in the interview with Woodward, called a nuclear attack here “a potential game changer.” He said: “When I go down the list of things I have to worry about all the time, that is at the top, because that’s one where you can’t afford any mistakes.”

It is reassuring to know that Obama thinks that a nuke attack on a US is a potential game changer. But then again, Indianapolis is a nest of Republicans so it might not be a game changer after all. I’m sure that he’ll bring the same sense of urgency and competency that he brought to the Gulf Oil Spill or Tennessee floods. Makes me feel all safe and comfy that Obama and his crack team are staying on top of this.


38 posted on 09/22/2010 8:28:12 AM PDT by Dogfaced Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Dogfaced Soldier

Obama calling a nuclear terrorist attack on our own shores ‘a POTENTIAL game changer’ should not give anyone a sense of reassurance or safety.

To any sane thinking American, who TRULY loves this country, a nuclear terrorist attack on our country is a DEFINATE ‘game changer’. He is signaling once again that he is weak kneed,incompetent or worse..complicit.


39 posted on 09/22/2010 8:37:10 AM PDT by penelopesire ('You are either with us or you are with the marxists')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson