Stick a fork in her......
Liberals talk about their candidates, and it become a circle-j*rk.
Conservatives talk about our candidates.
And it becomes a circular firing squad.
37 posts before someone had either the courage, or the intellect to say what is plainly true. You don't dig out of a 12-point (at best) deficit by practicing the black arts. Just saying.
Just because O'Donnell was better than Castle, doesn't mean O'Donnell was a good choice. Sometimes in politics, there are bad candidates and horrible candidates. O'Donnell appears to be the later, not the former.
37 posts before someone had either the courage, or the intellect to say what is plainly true. You don't dig out of a 12-point (at best) deficit by practicing the black arts. Just saying.
Just because O'Donnell was better than Castle, doesn't mean O'Donnell was a good choice. Sometimes in politics, there are bad candidates and horrible candidates. O'Donnell appears to be the later, not the former.
I also heard that she had a Ouija board, brought to a party one of those billiard balls that told you which course in life to take, and that she acted in the chorus of The Crucible about the Salem Witch Trials, demanding that the court accept spectral evidence of conjurin’. None of us “normal” people did anything like this, of course, we were just like the Lincolns (seances), Nancy Reagan (horoscopes to pick teh exact minute of Inauguration), Winston Churchill and FDR (use of clairvoyants as to when to begin D-Day), the CIA (experiments with remote viewing) and of all people, Bill Clinton, who told the Air Force to check on the veracity of the purported alien storage shed at Wright-Patterson.
Agreed. Going forward, the movement ought to think long and hard about a simple litmus test for candidates such as, "Has this person ever held a real job?"
Let's pray that she doesn't become an a albatross around our necks.
She probably dabbled in that too
She probably dabbled in that too