[SeeSac]

No, that IS NOT all you posted. Saying that a person can be murdered based on an unwritten statement IS the pro-death agenda:

I never said a person can be murdered on an unwritten statement. You are twisting my post to mean something I didn't write. I you are going to twist it, please, at least quote my post.

[wagglebee]

I never said a person can be murdered on an unwritten statement.

So, you are saying that you agree that Trisha Duguay was murdered on nothing more than some purported oral statements.

You are twisting my post to mean something I didn't write.

Then tell us what you really mean.

I you are going to twist it, please, at least quote my post.

Do you have a reading comprehension problem?

I did post it, in it's entirety, but here it is again:

To: Eternal_Bear

“Trisha made Jim promise: If she were to end up in a vegetative state, with no hope of getting better, he would not let her languish.”

94 posted on Sunday, October 24, 2010 1:53:05 PM by SeeSac

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

“Trisha made Jim promise: If she were to end up in a vegetative state, with no hope of getting better, he would not let her languish.”

[wagglebee]

I got to thinking about it and since you seem to have wandered onto a pro-life thread by accident, perhaps you can answer a few questions:

1. Do you believe in the right to life from conception to natural death (execution of criminals do not count)? YES or NO

2. Do you believe euthanasia should be legal? YES or NO

3. Do you believe assisted suicide should be legal? YES or NO

4. Do you believe that food and water are "extraordinary" life support and can be withdrawn? YES or NO

Please note that I am only interested in yes or no answers to these questions. (And I'll give you a hint libertarians who try to bring up money are actually using a leftist ploy formulated by the Nazis.)