It will be interesting to see how many Castle supporting “republicans” support her in the general election.
She’ll probably lose, because it’s a liberal state, but sometimes I think I’d rather see a dem elected than a damn RINO.
Castle might’ve been 1/3 better than a dem. That 1/3 can be substantial.
The conservatives (which I support mostly) have gone all in, and may well lose the big prize in the end. That would be 1/3 vs 0 and would suck to lose it all.
We’ll see.
Really, sometimes you’d rather see a Dem elected than a damn RINO? Please, explain that logic to me.
I’m stuck here in California and would go crazy to have a liberal RINO over Boxer or Feinstein. I hate Arnold as governor, absolutely hate him because he’s a RINO...but he’s better than having a complete turd liberal Democrat.
I’m sorry, but NEVER is it better to have a liberal Democrat than a damn RINO WHEN the damn RINO is the best you will ever get. And the best we will ever get in Delaware is a damn RINO. Instead, we just decided that having someone vote against 100% of the time was better than someone voting with us 65% of the time.
Absolutely foolish.
RINO is always better than Donk, if only because tilting the GOP into the majority affects committee chairmanships, etc., and that, in turn, can suppress the Donk agenda, derail judicial nominations, and allow the GOP to harass the Executive Branch with hearings and investigations. Put simply, it's always better to be the Majority Party.
When casting your vote, you have to remember it's not a statement of principle, but merely a political tactic.