Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah
Nope.

It's an unfortunate political reality.

Reagan did it to unite the party and get the moderates behind him. I'm guessing you don't mind that in hindsight, I sure don't, it helped get him elected. It's called political necessity.

277 posted on 09/13/2010 4:38:31 PM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies ]


To: Lakeshark

Times have changed since Reagan. There is a much deeper gulf between liberal and conseravative. More people are waking up.

The idea that a Repub Pres candidate has to have a moderate VP is not engraved in stone. Moderates do NOT win elections. They LOSE elections.

NO MODERATES! NONE! GET RID OF THEM! THEY ARE THE PROBLEM!

A moderate means someone who is not conservative, who is wishy washy, who has no spine, no guts, no gonads, who cares about what leftists, the MSM and the Dems think, is willing to compromise, back stab and surrender.

NO MODERATES!

Moderate Repubs are the very reason we are in such a sorry state right now.

No way is it a “political necessity”.

I call it “political suicide”!


279 posted on 09/13/2010 4:43:28 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson