You have a link to any info on the indictments, etc? Are you possibly thinking of Tom Delay?
Posted on 09/11/2010 2:10:28 AM PDT by Brices Crossroads
Message to Mittens:
In case you haven’t noticed, Sarah Palin ain’t Shannon O’Brien. If you haven’t noticed (or are too megalomaniacal to accept this fact), you can get a CRASH course starting in early 2012.
Now, how much tuition do you wish to pay for this little woodshedding..err...tutorial? 50 million? 100 million?
You could save yourself a lot of embarrassment if you just go ahead and write the check to SarahPac.
Armey + Romeny = what universe is this? LOL.
I am getting confused.
Wanna bet her third book is a big series of policy statements?
No need to call Armey names. There is nothing wrong with his views either. But Armey apparently spent too much time in DC and does not understand/remember that the American electorate does not elect Senators President.
They only did last time because both parties nominated senators. And even in that case the US electorate went for the least senatorial, ie the senator who had been in the senator the shortest.
So no it won’t be Demint in 2012. It will be a governor unless the GOP just likes having Obama as President. Armey probably does not know Palin and his view of her is probably based on what he has seen in the media.
Is she writing a third book?
True.
Listing Mitch Daniels, Chris Christie Tim Pawlenty in ones top four, is hardly a sign of conservatism.
Alcoholism, maybe.
Eff Dick (the prick) Armey!
Its not that I dislike DeMint, but he’s a puff at best in comparison to Palin’s understanding and determination.
Palin will ‘git’er done’ while DeMint and all the rest will dither about whether they are hurting the Dem’s feelings.
Please, no more “reaching across the aisle!”
.
> “Supporting Jim DeMint is hardly a sign of liberalism.”
.
DeMint is just a name he picked out of the air.
Just like the Dem/socialists, he fears Palin’s obvious facility at getting the rot out. When you’re part of the rot, the last thing you want to see coming is a drum of Get-Rot.
.
> “DeMint should definitely be high on the list for 2012. Nothin’ wrong with that!”
.
DeMint is not presently executive material. I would view him as an excellant choice to be Palin’s veep, and later taking over after her 2nd term.
.
> “I was surprised when Armey surfaced in the Tea Party movement!”
.
I was surprised when a rat showed up in my cheese wharehouse....
.
> “I heard of Sarah Palin, but Dick Army is a distant memory. What did he do as House majority leader that was memorable?”
.
Had to step down due to being criminally indicted??
.
It's worn-out because we've been hearing the same thing, over and over again, for about as long as I remember. This is just latest iteration of the same old thing. It's all we'll ever get if we keep listening to the "old guard" GOP like Armey.
Doncha think the question should read what will be the timing and the subject matter.........
Certainly not! I thought you had inside info that you hadn’t told me!!!
:-)
However, if she runs, she's writing a third to help bolster the campaign. Even if she doesn't it's likely she'll write another.
You have a link to any info on the indictments, etc? Are you possibly thinking of Tom Delay?
Not that I am aware of.
If she can marginalize Armey, the rest will topple in order.
I highly doubt DeMint will run. He will most likely support Mitt Romney as he did in 2008.
Which route do I recommend? Well...., this is not 1964 nor 1980. I’m not sure if anyone can bring the “big tent” together. Personally, I’m leaning more libertarian everyday because of the neo-cons perpetual war and the “religious right” always in your face preaching their moral authority. If there is a 2012 Ronald Reagan out there, please let me know.
If interested, the below link by Hunter Baker asks the same question: Can Libertarians and Social Conservatives find Common Ground?
“As the standard bearer for American conservatism for two decades, Ronald Reagan effortlessly embodied fusionism by uniting Mont Pelerin style libertarians, populist Christians, Burkean conservatives, and national security voters into a devastatingly successful electoral bloc. Today, it is nearly impossible to imagine a candidate winning both New York and Texas, but Reagan and that group of fellow travelers did...
So, can the marriage be saved? Are libertarians and social conservatives destined to grow further apart or can they unite around these points of connection involving social capital, suspicion of government power, and the privatization of public education? I submit the points of connection, notwithstanding messy public blow-ups like the Huckabee/Club for Growth affair, are much stronger than the forces pulling the two groups apart. This survey demonstrates how much they have in common and how fruitful conversation between the two can be...”
I also recommend Rendezvous with Destiny: Ronald Reagan and the Campaign That Changed America, by Craig Shirley. He spoke at 2010 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).
Ronald Reagan, the Libertarian
http://ricksincerethoughts.blogspot.com/2010/02/ronald-reagan-libertarian.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.