Skip to comments.
NYT: DEMS PLAN 'FIREWALL' TO SAVE HOUSE... DEVELOPING...
Drudge Report ^
| 09-04-10
| Drudge
Posted on 09/04/2010 3:45:32 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-154 next last
To: All
21
posted on
09/04/2010 3:56:12 PM PDT
by
Las Vegas Ron
(People I know have papers for their mongrels.)
To: Las Vegas Ron
I think we are working on a FireAll strategy.
22
posted on
09/04/2010 3:56:55 PM PDT
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: Tex-Con-Man
Kinda wish I knew what that headline meant... It means that the Times is in desperation panic bunker mode, their daddy liberal polits are about to be swept away in a tsunami of discontent, and they are powerless to do anything about it. Hence the caps (which is unusual for the Times) ...
heheheheeee ;)
To: Snickering Hound
Another brilliant idea, just like socialism
24
posted on
09/04/2010 3:58:26 PM PDT
by
Rome2000
(OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
To: Las Vegas Ron
If it’s truly effective and obvious, they better live inside human-sized kevlar ziplock bags for the rest of their lives or there will be a LOT of new, special and legal elections to replace “lost” lawmakers.
25
posted on
09/04/2010 3:58:32 PM PDT
by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality: Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
To: Las Vegas Ron
I’m feeling disenfranchised already.
26
posted on
09/04/2010 3:59:04 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Politicians exist to break windows so they may spend other people's money to fix them.)
To: Las Vegas Ron
Yep. Obama will say we can’t afford to pay for mid term elections because we need that money for more stimulus spending (to put up signs and send money to cronies like Jamie Gorelick). So the election is cancelled on acount of Chicago style-graft.
27
posted on
09/04/2010 3:59:17 PM PDT
by
rod1
To: Las Vegas Ron
The “kill cracker baby” undesirable voter suppression firewall.
To: Las Vegas Ron
Well, I will say that the Houston voting machines sure could have used a “firewall.” Although ACORN no doubt is glad they didn’t have one...
29
posted on
09/04/2010 3:59:27 PM PDT
by
MizSterious
("Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -JFK)
To: Tex-Con-Man
Kinda wish I knew what that headline meant...
It means that they are no longer going to try to compete in all the House Races, but wright off 30 or so in order to ensure that they hold just enough seats to retain the majority. Admitting you are adopting this strategy means that they know they are in for a butt kicking and are trying to salvage what they can.
30
posted on
09/04/2010 4:00:24 PM PDT
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: Las Vegas Ron
It will be the ol’ Social Security scare. Seniors, it’s Democrats or dog food!
To: rednek
It’s too late. I already voted.
32
posted on
09/04/2010 4:02:27 PM PDT
by
GAB-1955
(I write books, love my wife, serve my nation, and believe in the Resurrection.)
To: rednek
No way would they get away with calling the election off. No way.
To: Las Vegas Ron
Typical Drudge hyperbolic link that links to itself, then link to itself, then its developing, and continues to link to itself.
34
posted on
09/04/2010 4:03:14 PM PDT
by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
To: skeeter
So you think they would adverstise that plan in the NYT?
To: Charles Henrickson
Reid is alrady running similar commercials here against Angle.
No surprise though, same book, different page (election year)
36
posted on
09/04/2010 4:05:30 PM PDT
by
Las Vegas Ron
(People I know have papers for their mongrels.)
To: rednek
I'm curious how you think BHO can (from the Executive branch) cancel elections for Congress (The Legislative branch); I'm thinking as it stands now, the Judical branch may have something to say about it.
As far as I am concerned; if any leftist bastard tries to "halt" elections, then all bets are off and said leftist bastards are out in the open seditious.
I'll say nothing more about what would need to be done.
37
posted on
09/04/2010 4:06:11 PM PDT
by
Michael Barnes
(Call me when the bullets start flying.)
To: Tex-Con-Man
I assume it means they will concentrate on enough close races to limit their losses to just enough to retain a majority. Two more years of Nancy Antoinette....
38
posted on
09/04/2010 4:06:37 PM PDT
by
clintonh8r
("Let them eat lobster cake." Michelle Antoinette, vacation #6.)
To: GonzoGOP
Why are you trying to disrupt a perfectly good “smart-ass responses” thread with something that makes perfect sense? I bet you are correct.
To: Las Vegas Ron
Developing story on Drudge....no article Well that's certainly intriguing.
A meaningless line of text on Sludge's site.
I'm all a-quiver over that, I'll tell you what.
40
posted on
09/04/2010 4:07:51 PM PDT
by
humblegunner
(Pablo is very wily)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-154 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson