Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MontaniSemperLiberi
I agree that these Executive decisions have become defacto laws, and must be challenged.

It is unfortunate that the Executive has grown to such an extent, and our laws accumulated over the years, such that decisions on how to run the Executive branch, and how the law is going to be enforced - has become like one man making defacto law - which is exactly what our Constitution avoids.

I agree that Congress needs to keep an eye on this, but not sure of the best mechanism to do so. A Congressional oversight committee I find preferable to a law passed by Congress creating an extra-Constitutional demand upon the Executive that their internal regulation is all subject to Congressional up or down votes.

JMHO.

95 posted on 09/02/2010 6:09:20 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream

As an aside, a presidential advisory committee was considered by the founders. They went back and forth on it an eventually put that function in the Senate under the “Advise and Consent” function of the Senate. That’s not really what you are talking about but I thought it was an interesting parallel to what you are saying.


98 posted on 09/02/2010 6:25:46 PM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson