Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: outpostinmass2

Boston has lost about a third of it’s population. San Fran the same. They are depopulating.

I’m not sure of the demographics but I believe Boston anyways, is getting older. In short young people are not moving in and having young children.

Boston might not be dying, but it’s fading.


221 posted on 09/01/2010 1:36:59 PM PDT by Leisler ("Over time they create a legal system that plunders and a moral code that glorifies it." F. Bastiat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: Leisler

Boston Historical populations Year Pop. %± 1722* 10,567 — 1765* 15,520 46.9% 1790 18,320 18.0% 1800 24,937 36.1% 1810 33,787 35.5% 1820 43,298 28.1% 1830 61,392 41.8% 1840 93,383 52.1% 1850 136,881 46.6% 1860 177,840 29.9% 1870 250,526 40.9% 1880 362,839 44.8% 1890 448,477 23.6% 1900 560,892 25.1% 1910 670,585 19.6% 1920 748,060 11.6% 1930 781,188 4.4% 1940 770,816 −1.3% 1950 801,444 4.0% 1960 697,197 −13.0% 1970 641,071 −8.1% 1980 562,994 −12.2% 1990 574,283 2.0% 2000 589,141 2.6% 2009* 645,169 9.5% Population has been on an upswing for twenty years. Furthermore many of the poor overpopulated neighborhoods have been gentrified by less populated wealthier people. Compared to my youth during the 60’s and 70’s, Boston is thriving. Boston is getting younger as well. San Francisco population 808,976. Highest ever.


226 posted on 09/01/2010 2:18:55 PM PDT by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson