To: mlo
" It's not straw man, it's very much to the point. Name one other president that has produced a birth certificate to prove he was eligible. Come on, just one. "
Perhaps ? other than President Chester Arthur, that there where no suspicions that they were not natural born, besides ? how do you know for a fact that they didn't show their documents ?
I don't care about the past presidents, we care about the present one.
And no, sorry Obots, just because President Chester Arthur got away with it, does not mean that Obama should.
To: American Constitutionalist
You seem to have gotten confused. The claim was that the Constitution required documentation. I asked you to show one other president that has produced a birth certificate to prove eligibility, as part of that documentation requirement. You answered with:
"Perhaps ? other than President Chester Arthur, that there where no suspicions that they were not natural born, besides ? how do you know for a fact that they didn't show their documents ?"
Either there's a documentation requirement or there isn't. What anyone suspected is beside the point.
Why not just acknowledge that the constitution has no such requirement and move on?
132 posted on
09/04/2010 9:37:06 AM PDT by
mlo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson