Why not just say you’re going to ignore what I said because you’re not willing to think about it?
I didn't ignore your question, did you not see that 'yes' at the beginning of my first sentence?
You wrote:
It is supposedly a basic tenet of libertarianism that you do not have the right to impose consequences on me without my consent...
I answered. You are putting consequences on property owners for personal enjoyment. You have a right to pursue enjoyment, you don't have a right to enjoyment, especially on someone elses property.
We can bicker left and right on how people annoy us, but it will turn into an episode of Oprah.
This is a Private Property issue, cling to it as long as we can because it is dwindling fast and furious.
When all is said and done: This is not about smoking - never was.
“Why not just say you’re going to ignore what I said because you’re not willing to think about it?”
Hello pot, meet kettle.