Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sorry, you can't smoke in your own apartment
y100.com ^ | Aug. 30, 2010

Posted on 08/31/2010 7:56:06 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-177 last
To: Theo
Theo, the thrust of the anti-smokers argument is the physical damage caused by second hand smoke.
There is no definitive scientific proof that second hand smoke has ever cuased damage to anyone that does not have a pre-existing medical condition.

The real argument behind most anti-smoker's stance is that they just don't like the smell.

I have posted on this for many years and know the science, the studies, and have debated the point many times.

Other posters on this thread have pointed out what the debate is about, private property rights.
Not the rights of the woman who lived under you but the rights of the landlord who owned the property.

161 posted on 09/02/2010 9:02:05 PM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Theo
When you live in a communal situation, you need to be considerate of your community.

That is correct.

You should consider being considerate of the smokers in your "community".

162 posted on 09/07/2010 4:21:39 PM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Theo
she did make our lives miserable during the 3 months that we lived there.

You should have embraced the experience.

163 posted on 09/07/2010 4:45:57 PM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Theo

“Ruin” is a pretty strong word.


164 posted on 09/07/2010 4:47:17 PM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Theo
Laws restricting your freedoms can be good.

What??????????

165 posted on 09/07/2010 4:48:37 PM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Laws like this come in response to the fact that smokers' personal choices tend to inflict unwanted consequences on those around them.

What consequences would those be?

I don't like the smell of hooker perfume that is everywhere in every retail outlet I visit.

Should I advocate banning hooker perfume?

166 posted on 09/07/2010 5:00:30 PM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

You’re surprised? Every law restricts your freedom in some way. Do you prefer anarchy?


167 posted on 09/09/2010 10:19:09 AM PDT by Theo (May Rome decrease and Christ increase.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Kinda has a ring of inevitability don’t it.

What a Nannyist Dystopia is in store for us.


168 posted on 09/09/2010 1:31:44 PM PDT by swarthyguy (KIDS! Deficit, Debt,Taxes!Pfft Lookit the bright side of our legacy -Ummrika is almost SmokFrei!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

Certainly being considerate, whether you’re a smoker or a non-smoker, is key. I am a non-smoker, and live in the heart of tobacco country— Winston-Salem, NC (actually in Lewisville, just outside of WS). I am in my early 50s, and grew up in a time when smoking was pretty much allowed, dare I say encouraged, most anywhere. Maybe not in church, but just outside. There were no non-smoking areas, including on airplanes. It seems most people smoked. (Watch most any movie from the late 50s and early 60s to see that this was true.) For whatever reason, health, perceived health or just a change in social mores, fewer people now smoke. Over time it changed from “mind if I smoke?” to growing bans on smoking.

These sort of changes are difficult for many people, and especially for smokers. My mother smoked until she died at age 43. My father quit, and my sister has recently quit. I don’t care if people smoke, and I believe in property owners’ rights as determinative of whether smoking ought to be allowed on one’s property. That said, tobacco smoke irritates me. I don’t think it’ll kill me, I just think it smells bad, and it lingers. Smokers cannot really appreciate this, and that is understandable. I don’t support these laws banning apartment smoking, or restaurant smoking either, although for me personally eating out is more enjoyable now. The owner of the business should make that call, and let the market rule.

I see I have ranted. Sorry. It’s going to take understanding by both sides. Non-smokers should understand that smokers can’t quit, or else they wouldn’t stand outside in the cold and rain to smoke. Smokers should understand that non-smokers don’t like the smell, whether it is harmful or not, and the smell stays with you longer than smokers can know, even if you are near a smoker outside, it is bothersome. Reasonable people ought to be able to work this stuff out.


169 posted on 09/09/2010 2:09:59 PM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441
Non-smokers should understand that smokers can’t quit, or else they wouldn’t stand outside in the cold and rain to smoke.

Non-smokers should also understand that a lot of smokers have no interest in quitting smoking.

Smokers should understand that non-smokers don’t like the smell, whether it is harmful or not

And non-smokers should just get over it.

I am a smoker that doesn't like the smell of manure or fern bars, so I don't go near either.

170 posted on 09/13/2010 2:52:20 PM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Theo
Do you prefer anarchy?

Yes.

171 posted on 09/13/2010 3:06:46 PM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

You know we have a constitutional republic here in the U.S., right? If you prefer anarchy, you’ll have to go elsewhere. We are a nation of laws informed by Judeo-Christian principles, not of mob rule.


172 posted on 09/13/2010 5:01:20 PM PDT by Theo (May Rome decrease and Christ increase.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

Of course you are right that many, maybe most smokers, really enjoy it. I am cool with that. But the majority has moved from the smokers to the non-smokers, and the laws are reflecting that. I support smokers’ rights, but smokers are going to have to get over the fact that they are in the minority and will likely get fewer and fewer places to smoke in the future.


173 posted on 09/13/2010 7:12:13 PM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Theo
You know we have a constitutional republic here in the U.S., right? If you prefer anarchy, you’ll have to go elsewhere. We are a nation of laws informed by Judeo-Christian principles, not of mob rule.

The smoking bans were largely done by ballot measures, not by representation.

That is direct democracy, otherwise known as mob rule.

174 posted on 09/15/2010 11:58:01 AM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441

See # 174.


175 posted on 09/15/2010 12:05:20 PM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

The smoking ban in restaurants and other places was done by our state legislature in NC (never thought I’d see the day). I don’t support it, as I have said.


176 posted on 09/15/2010 12:46:33 PM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441
The smoking ban in restaurants and other places was done by our state legislature in NC

Congratulations on living in a nanny state.......one of the many reasons I recently moved to Texas - no statewide smoking ban, never will be.

177 posted on 09/15/2010 5:23:33 PM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-177 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson