Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Successful Tea Party Movement Must Include Pro-Life Issues, Not Just Economy
Life News ^ | 8/31/10 | Tom Glessner

Posted on 08/31/2010 4:17:24 PM PDT by wagglebee

LifeNews.com Note: Tom Glessner is a pro-life attorney who is the president of NIFLA, the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates. NIFLA is an organization with more than 1,200 affiliated pregnancy centers that provides legal, medical and practical help for pregnancy centers across the country.

Political change is blowing in the wind but it is not the change promised by Barack Obama when he ran for the presidency. For sure, Obama has brought political change to the nation, but his transformational policies have meant bigger government, higher taxes, federal subsidies of abortion on demand, and greater governmental control over the lives of American citizens.

Hundreds of thousands of citizens across the nation have raised their voices to protest Obama’s policies of change. They are crying out for a different change that will honor the integrity of each individual and create an atmosphere where true liberty in all spheres of life – economic, cultural, and spiritual- reigns. Political pollsters are now predicting a huge seismic shift in the political landscape this November. The recent Glenn Beck sponsored rally in Washington D.C., attended by thousands upon thousands of grass roots activists, indicates that this public outcry of protest is real and powerful.

The Tea Party movement is comprised of Republicans, Democrats, and Independents from all walks of life. The political ruling elite, the corporate world, and the media have completely failed to comprehend this populist movement dismissing it as marginal, extreme and even racist. However, this movement is not composed of ignorant and bigoted individuals, as suggested by the political class. Rather, it is an authentic grassroots movement of thoughtful and patriotic people demanding real change from an out-of-touch political establishment.

The Tea Party movement, for the most part, centers its protest on economic issues and concern about the loss of freedom that an ever-growing federal government brings. These concerns are valid and appropriate. Most leaders of this movement also believe in the sanctity of life and the need to halt the wholesale destruction of innocent human life through abortion and other life related issues such as embryonic stem cell research. However, many in the Tea Party movement have made it clear that while they are sympathetic with the pro-life cause, the abortion issue is not formally part of the Tea Party agenda.

Economic issues are a vital concern; as is the growing size of the federal government and its overreaching into the lives of ordinary citizens. The overwhelming burden of excess regulation and taxation upon businesses and individuals is alarming. In the same manner, however, the killing of 1.25 million unborn children annually from abortion must be a grave concern. Accordingly, a failure by the Tea Party to incorporate the serious pro-life concerns of millions of Americans into its agenda will be fatal to achieving success.

Perhaps, the Tea Party should take a lesson from the old fashioned three-legged milking stool. When I was a child I visited my aunt and uncle on their dairy farm and was intrigued watching my uncle milk the cows while sitting on a three-legged stool. I asked him why he used such a funny chair to milk the cows. He explained that a four-legged chair can be unbalanced if one of its legs is a different length than the others and it could even tip over if you leaned backwards. A three-legged stool, on the other hand, balances evenly and won't tip over even if one of its legs is longer

We should learn something from the old-fashioned milking stool. There are three legs to a successful agenda that will change America for the better. Each leg is critical and the current grassroots movement for change in America will collapse if any of these legs is ignored. These legs are:

1) Revival of the Economy: This leg requires the establishment a strong robust economy that creates full employment and does not burden small businesses with taxes and oppressive regulations that hinder job development. Limited government and reduced taxation are at the core and are necessary to bring the nation out of the serious economic recession/depression in which we find ourselves.

2) Maintaining a Strong National Defense and Protecting Homeland Security: This leg requires a serious commitment by the government to win the war on terror and protect our country’s border from those who would illegally enter and do us harm.

3) Protecting the Family Unit and Restoring the Right to Life for All: The social issues – protecting the sanctity of marriage and restoring the right to life – are issues of equal importance. Millions of Americans, including myself, have placed these issues at the top of the priority list for the next generation of political leaders to seriously address.

To date, while it appears that most Tea Party leaders verbally support all three legs of this “milk stool” some, such as Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels, assert that the social issues (and specifically abortion and the right to life) must take a back seat to the other two legs, which are seen as more important.

A further example of this viewpoint was shown in a recent interview of Sarah Palin with Sean Hannity of Fox News. Gov. Sarah Palin, a committed pro-life leader, was asked to name the top five issues facing the country today and the deaths of 1.25 million unborn annually from abortion was not on her list. If, indeed, this is the approach a new Congress takes after the November mid-term elections, then the agenda of the Tea Party movement will fail.

America must be forewarned. A nation that fails to protect the lives of its most vulnerable members has set a course for itself that will lead to its eventual destruction from within. The killing of future generations through the act of abortion has already taken a toll on the demographical future of the nation and the Western world. Unless this trend is stopped then, notwithstanding the impact of the Tea Party movement, our culture and nation will have effectively committed suicide.

The invention of the three-legged milking stool was truly ingenious. Will the current populist movement for change understand this and formally incorporate the life issues into its agenda? Time will tell and the future of America hangs in the balance.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; moralabsolutes; prolife; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 321-339 next last
To: mnehring; little jeremiah
I experimented with A LOT of illicit substances in my youth and NEVER came up with anything this bizarre!


261 posted on 09/01/2010 5:27:01 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
They want lower taxes and own guns, it ends there.

I think *most* social conservatives and have much more than that in common with *most* libertarians but let's just say you're right and it ends there.

Such simple goals should hardly contradict any of your goals and are perhaps a class of voters that should not be alienated.

262 posted on 09/01/2010 5:28:57 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

I feel sullied after reading it!

Or as though I just attended a Steve Gaskin meeting at the Family Dog in San Francisco, 1969..... (shudder)


263 posted on 09/01/2010 5:30:08 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Actually, that would be Steven Gaskin mixed with the worst of the worst car salemen/telemarketers/New Ageism.

A really sickening mixture. Maybe I’ll be able to puke up the hash brownies!


264 posted on 09/01/2010 5:31:32 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
The Republican Party is still focused on all 3 legs, econ, social and national security...that is what important.

Important to you, perhaps, but not so much to most Americans. Republicans (and Democrats) will need to adjust their thinking if they want to gain back some of the disaffected voters who've either joined minor parties or gone "independent" in the last several years.

While the "three-legged stool" does differentiate the R's from the D's to a degree, there are many more areas of agreement than many of us would like to see--and one of the most glaring is the tendency of both parties to make Washington responsible for fixing all the problems they see in America, from the cost of health care to how much water your toilet uses when you flush it.

The Tea Parties, in concentrating on the fiscal mess the Congress has created, have succeeded in avoiding the contentious issues of war and peace, abortion and how many mosques per square mile are needed in New York City. Some here wish they would "take a stand." This would be their undoing, as their success (as contrasted to the Republican Party) can only be attributed to not taking a stand on such matters which, though important to some, are divisive and unrelated to the primary goal: shrinking the federal government's budget and its control over so many areas of society.

265 posted on 09/01/2010 5:31:46 PM PDT by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I experimented with A LOT of illicit substances in my youth and NEVER came up with anything this bizarre!

I'm with you on that much.

So you see why we should be careful in just how many social motives we want to cloud the room up with!

Let pro-lifers be pro-life! More power to them.

Let 12 visions people (who I'd never heard of before this post) do whatever it is they do.

Let the tea party be about smaller government.

266 posted on 09/01/2010 5:32:57 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog; wagglebee

One problem is that liber(al)tarians and “fiscal conservative/social liberals” is that they are actively antagonistic to social conservatism.

They are not “live and let live” at all, but inimical to social conservative goals. And they are generally duplicitous. They want to “win” and destroy social conservatism. They do not want to join up with, but dominate. This to me is the crux of the problem. And to top it off, they cannot debate fairly.


267 posted on 09/01/2010 5:34:44 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
And to top it off, they cannot debate fairly.

You mean they do things like making vague red herring generalizations about the other side and what it believes? ;~p

268 posted on 09/01/2010 5:38:13 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

I’ve been “debating” with them for a long, long time and they are always the same.

They ignore stuff, repeat the same unprovable assertions based on mental ideas that have never worked and will never work in real life, etc.

It’s basically libertarianism, which is just another “kingdom of God without God” materialistic, unworkable fantasy.

The 12 Vision Party is just another incarnation of the same pipe dream (they even have nice green smoke!), in spades, or perhaps taken to its logical conclusion. Although in reality, the conclusion would be quite, quite different from the ad copy.


269 posted on 09/01/2010 5:42:38 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog; wagglebee

If you don’t think they are antogonistic and trying for total dominance, read the articles and threads that waggelbee and I ping out daily, say for two weeks. Anyone not wearing cokebottle dark glass moral blinders will see exactly what I am talking about.


270 posted on 09/01/2010 5:44:11 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp; little jeremiah; wagglebee; BykrBayb; xzins; blue-duncan
And I suspect the Mormon tendency (i.e., Beck) to Libertarianism is because eventually they want to restore polygamy.

If anything I think the Mormon Church is more afraid that polygamy will become legal. I doubt if any of the current leadership in the LDS Church wants to reinstate it, but if it were made legal, then they would have a hard time preventing the true believers from following in Joseph Smith's crooked footsteps.

It would be hard for Mormons to continue to claim they are a mainstream religion if their membership went back to practicing polygamy.

271 posted on 09/01/2010 5:46:40 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
I'm sure you've debated a lot of people, but I also think that libertarians cannot fit in the box you'd like them to fit in for purpose of this argument. You describe human traits and weaknesses in debate skills, not political differences.

The 12 vision party is a group of hippies. Not anything like any of the libertarian-leaning people I know, any more than Westboro is indicative of Baptist thought.

272 posted on 09/01/2010 5:50:54 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Hmm. I almost wish they would start pushing polygamy so they’d be more clear about what they really are.


273 posted on 09/01/2010 5:51:05 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

I don’t know about that. I’ve debated and seen comments in the last few weeks just here on FR and another site that are all I’ve described and more. The line between “ultra leftist” and “libertine-arian” is pretty fuzzy.


274 posted on 09/01/2010 5:52:36 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
By the way, it isn't hijacking, it is a shared value among a majority of the Right.

Demanding one movement adopt the message of another under threat of some action is a hijacking. A hijacking by any other name is still a hijacking.

Answer the question: why does the pro-Life movement feel the need to hijack the Tea Party movement? What exactly is the point in distorting, diminishing and blurring the two messages together where they lose value, rather than have each shine brightly on its own?

275 posted on 09/01/2010 6:00:10 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

So, if you were a liberal, what *would* you call abortion and gay marriage?

Once you empower the government to enforce your ideas on these matters... then, when the liberals take power, it has the power to enforce *their* ideas.


276 posted on 09/01/2010 6:12:54 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; HairOfTheDog; wagglebee

Bull. Complete bull.

Fiscal conservatives would like to see all issues resolved at the lowest level possible, by starving the federal government out of the equation... and don’t really care how it plays out.

So if it plays out to a social conservative point of view... fine. If not, fine.

But to you, little jeremiah, that *ISN’T* a ‘live and let live’ viewpoint. To which I say, “Riiiiight.”


277 posted on 09/01/2010 6:16:42 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
If anything I think the Mormon Church is more afraid that polygamy will become legal. I doubt if any of the current leadership in the LDS Church wants to reinstate it

Good points. However, the modern LDS does not condemn its prior position on polygamy, and it is still quietly practiced in many places.

278 posted on 09/01/2010 6:18:46 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

hi, glad to see that you are back on the FR, how are you feeling??


279 posted on 09/01/2010 6:25:32 PM PDT by Coleus (Abortion, Euthanasia & FOCA - - don't Obama and the Democrats just kill ya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla
Geez, that’s low. Posting your own work

LOL! Go get published in some respectable media outlets, and you might be able to do likewise ;-)

280 posted on 09/01/2010 6:30:30 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 321-339 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson