I note that you both appear to have ignored my posts due to your lack of a reply. In them I refuted both of your assertions about the “anti’s”. I also posted to you that I had originally offered my prayers to the Bishop’s family. It wasn’t until others had started their smear campaign against the “anti’s” that this thread took on a life of its own and veered in whole other direction.
I also note you persist in addressing the true perpetrators of the smears on this thread and calling for them to cease. In effect, you are complicit in their statements/assertions by refusing to refute them.
I note again, that both of you insist on deflecting, trying to make this about the “anti’s” when it was the mormons and their “defenders” who started this flame war. Apologist’s to the end? Ends justify the means?
Like I mentioned in one of my earlier posts, I’m grateful my MORMON wife doesn’t behave as you or the others do.
This is a tragedy for both families directly affected by this man’s actions.
The fact that others have used this tragedy to begin a smear campaign to impugn the character of FReepers who question the mormon doctrine and dogma is a secondary tragedy. Collateral damage if you will.
“It wasn’t until others had started their smear campaign against the ‘anti’s’ that this thread took on a life of its own “
You just lost all credibility.
You meant NOT addressing.....
Correct?
do not want to wrangle over he said, she said if you say you did not smear good thank you!
Have a nice day!
This is like watching a political mudslinging. The anti-Mormons are trying to actually pretend that all of the history of their almost daily attacks doesn’t exist. Oh so innocent and picked on by the Mormons. /eyeroll
I am sticking with the term anti-Mormons. Our religion is an integral part of us. You know exactly what we mean. Playing Bill Clinton word games is merely a distraction. Yet another non-issue being flag waved and pointed at.