Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brices Crossroads; All

I have to say, I’m not at all confident Miller has this in the bag. Murkowski only needs to win about 55% of the absentee ballots to win. What reason is there to believe that she doesn’t get 55%? She won about that same amount of the early voting, which occurred before Miller’s surge, and without the abortion ballot measure. I’m getting a bad sense that Murkowski will win in the end. I feel the odds are 65% that she does.


94 posted on 08/30/2010 1:12:15 PM PDT by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: St. Louis Conservative

I agree with you, and though Alaska people talk like rebels on occasion, they are mostly very conventional in the end. They want that federal money too.


96 posted on 08/30/2010 2:42:48 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Rush was right when he said America may survive Obama but not the Obama supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

To: St. Louis Conservative; onyx; Al B.

“I have to say, I’m not at all confident Miller has this in the bag. Murkowski only needs to win about 55% of the absentee ballots to win. What reason is there to believe that she doesn’t get 55%?”

You want a reason. Here is a good reason. Most of the absentees very likely come from 4 militar, a very good reasony bases where Miller got 75% of the vote on election day.

http://www.conservatives4palin.com/2010/08/good-news-disproportionate-percentage.html


102 posted on 08/30/2010 4:17:33 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson