I am not one who likes to be right, but lose. I dont have to give up any core values in order to focus on winning issues.”
------------------------------------------------------------ My point is that if you don't win running on core issues, then how can you assert that being elected is a “win”?
Being elected on fiscal issues alone means nothing. Why? Because the actual fiscal ‘core issues’ haven't even been elucidate, much less campaigned upon. These issues would be the unconstitutional existences of the private central bank, called the Federal Reserve. The Congressional abrogation to “issue and regulate the value thereof”, the imposition of a head tax (known as income tax) upon wages (as opposed to profit and stock income), and etc ....
Those are pretty big issues, why do you say winning on them would mean nothing?