Posted on 08/25/2010 3:42:53 PM PDT by Altura Ct.
I’m not sure what you mean.
Do you mean that the video and his descriptions are wildly, fantastically, at odds, or something that I said?
The police reports and murder investigation, and video show how bizarre his accounts are, no fights, no shoot out, no wound on him, even the description of his shooting and the guns used in what order, it is just as made up as his “war” record and injuries.
It doesn’t prove an “execution.” It only shows that he shot him while he was down.
Typical Obama voters...
The video, the autopsy, the physical evidence, the coroners report all point to what most people think that looks like, even though they cannot actually see the unconscious form that is just blocked from the view of the camera, the charge of murder was handed down after the evidence was looked at, the trial will be about what the law claims was an execution.
Is your objection to the charge because you don’t trust the evidence, or because it was a robber?
Both.
Why do you deny the evidence?
What do you mean deny it? You asked me if I trusted it.
LOL, Why do you deny it?
Why do you distrust it?
Why do you not trust it?
Why do you not believe the coroner and investigators, and the portion that you can see on video?
What kind of word game are you playing, did you really not understand what I was asking?
Look who’s playing word games. I don’t need a bunch of sophistry. Thanks anyway.
OK, thanks for wasting my time.
Yeah, I held a gun to your head. /s lol
That pretty much fits with the rest of your posts to me, now I see them as hostile, and meant to waste my time.
You’re a mind reader too? lol If I have any hostility towards you it’s for wasting my time. But it was really just rejoinder in kind not anger.
You first started pinging me with what I took to be cryptic requests for more information, or clarification, I should have seen it for what it was, just meaningless wisecracks.
It is becoming clear that your critical thinking skills suffer from hallucinatory bouts.
It is clear that you aren’t looking for information, and evidently you don’t know that pinging someone with a short, cryptic, sentence saying that they are wrong, will get an answer from a good freeper following up.
I gave you honest, clear and concise answers until you started in with the wisecracks and word games. Your projection is what hung up the discussion.
You answered in your cryptic manner, "both", so I asked for clarification, that resulted in a post of, deny versus trust, which looked to me like a word game, you had to know what I was asking.
I can’t help it if you think ‘deny’ and ‘trust’ are synonyms. If your reply about that wasn’t meant to be smartassed I apologize for not seeing that. There was nothing cryptic about my answers.
YOU saw an execution, and I suspect you saw it because you have an attitude about guns and self-defense that I would probably find offensive. What I saw was a man defending himself and other from someone who was part of a group of thugs who came into the store with a gun and threatened the lives of all inside. If you knew anything at all about self defense, you’d know that you don’t let an attacker get the chance to get to a weapon. If he was moving after being shot, he could have been going for a weapon. If he didn’t have a weapon, tough luck for the thug: no one has x-ray eyes to know that, and waiting to find out could have meant injury or death for those inside the store.
Ersland is no psycho. Liar, maybe, but not a psycho.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.