Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: D-fendr
Over the last decade, it seems a player would be better off asset-wise had they gone with Apple over MSFT with the same investment.

And for the decade before that, MSFT was the clear winner. Remember, past performance is NOT indicative of future performance! The last two decades for MSFT and AAPL show that...

For predicting the future, I look at hard numbers: profitability, P/E ratio, market share, stability, revenue, dividend. In all those measures, AAPL comes up short compared to MSFT, and not much better than GOOG. To me, it's a much riskier future investment than either MSFT or GOOG.

The last decade may have been better, but it's hard to go back in time and invest over the last decade. I can only invest in the future. And the future doesn't look really stable for AAPL, given the current numbers...

38 posted on 08/23/2010 11:44:16 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: PugetSoundSoldier

And the future doesn’t look bright for MSFT IMHO.

Hell, I’d sell them both.


42 posted on 08/23/2010 12:00:31 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson