Now to be referred to as the Cordoba WTC Victory Mosque, established in New Mecca, USA.
That is new mecca, new york.
“In an UNUSUAL MOVE...?” Are you kidding? Since when is it unusual for the AP to circle the wagons for the democrat party and the rest of the left???
Ok, how about Obama’s Mosque?
I have contended all along that it should not be called “9/11,” “ground zero,” or “WTC.” It should have always been called “The Atrocity.” The subject mosque would then be: “The Atrocity mosque,” or, better, “the Exodus 23:19 mosque.”
(i.e. adding insult to injury)
Exodus 23:19
“...You are not to boil a young goat in the milk of its mother.”
DG
Here are a few suggestions:
1) Cordoba Center II!
2) New York Dome of the Rock!!
Now to be referred to as the Cordoba WTC Victory Mosque, established in New Mecca, USA.
Actually, that is my prefered way of referring to that abomination. Though it does matter in a symbolic sense where they build it, what is far more offensive to me is the occasion of why they are building it.
I am getting to hold the belief that this is yet another trick by the enemedia to help raise funds for this atrocity by making it a part of everyone's conversation. Whereas this terrorist sympathizer who is raising loot to build it, without the help of the global discussion of it, he would only have the services of the US Department of Hate to underwrite his fund-raising efforts in the Middle East. Now, with all of the publicity, he has the cred to approach his potential benefactors by telling them that this would be a wonderous tweak on the Great Satan.