Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36
Alright, to use Strong's references, then, if that's what you want to use, I am saying that the meaning of "Barack" is related to Strong's 1288, barak, "bless," and NOT to Strong's 1300, baraq, "lightning."

Which Strong's reference do you think it is related to?

50 posted on 08/18/2010 7:16:19 PM PDT by Charles Henrickson (M.Div., S.T.M., Ph.D. candidate in Biblical Studies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Charles Henrickson
...I am saying that the meaning of "Barack" is related to Strong's 1288, barak, "bless," and NOT to Strong's 1300, baraq, "lightning."
I'm not saying that it's related to 1300 either. That's some more of your deliberate attempts at the confusion of two separate replies of mine. Not a nice thing for "a man of the cloth" to do.

Which Strong's reference do you think it is related to?
Since I haven't weighed in one way or the other till now I'll go with 1288.
Do you concede that 1289 isn't a root and 1288 is the root from whence 1289 came?

54 posted on 08/18/2010 7:38:17 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson