Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Karliner
What it sounds like you're saying is there's a larger window depending on certain variables for the rods to go fully hot?

I don't think it's prudent to go into detail, but that's essentially correct. Nothing changes in the fuel rod from storage to installation in a reactor that is shut down with the control rods fully lowered or in some equivalent condition. The risk level for the fuel rods changes fairly rapidly after the control rods are raised and the reactor goes critical.

165 posted on 08/18/2010 6:15:36 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: Pollster1
True, it wouldn't be prudent. Sorry for asking. I just spoke with a nuclear physicist I know, couldn't understand much but he elaborated a bit more, thanks for the answer nevertheless. Of course I'm the same way with my past hx with nuclear power...I don't ever tell a soul, just the basics, raw basics; sadly getting older I use a little pun I created or maybe heard it somewhere and just think it's mine:

"I've forgotten more than I ever remembered( goes with my tag line)."

167 posted on 08/18/2010 1:27:33 PM PDT by Karliner ("Things are more like they are now than they ever were before."DDE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson