Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Couple in Duluth SWAT Standoff Speaks (Foreclosure)
FOX 5 ^ | 8/12/2010 | MYFOXATLANTA STAFF/myfoxatlanta

Posted on 08/15/2010 5:47:26 AM PDT by Chunga85

DULUTH, Ga. - A couple who lost their home to foreclosure and spent hours locked in a SWAT standoff with police when they refused to leave, talked about the situation Thursday.

The Grabers said they were living their version of the American dream. The Grabers said they owned their home for more than a decade when Howard Graber suffered a massive stroke. The Grabers said that's when everything changed.

On Wednesday, Gwinnett County deputies went to the Graber's Davenport Park Lane home to serve an eviction notice after the bank had foreclosed on the property. It turned into a four hour standoff and SWAT teams were called in.

"I was afraid for my life. I was afraid for my disabled husband's life. There's no way I was going to go to the front door," said Noya Lee Graber.

Police eventually stormed the house. Howard Graber spent the night in jail.

"They said, 'Taser her! Taser her now!' and I got tasered right on my stomach," said Noya Lee Graber.

(Excerpt) Read more at myfoxatlanta.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bailouts; donutwatch; foreclosurefraud; hamp; swat; tarp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: dragnet2

Btw, I never mentioned corporations you did. And you think because they got bailed out everyone should. I said that is a child’s logic. Just cause “Johnny” got away with something doesn’t mean that it’s ok for you to do the same.


61 posted on 08/15/2010 11:30:36 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2; Secret Agent Man
While you were perusing my posts, looking to nitpick, you should have read this one. Missed it, didn't ya.

Post 27

And my lunch didn't burn. It was delicious.

62 posted on 08/15/2010 12:54:29 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
You clearly said the little people, those tax payers with little or no money, that have been beat like a drum in this meat grinding economy, must do the responsible thing and pay they bills, and their debts. Or lose it all and get out.

You have stated this *ethical* and *conservative* thing to do.

Do you deny this?

63 posted on 08/15/2010 1:02:42 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
Dude, I can't afford a house. If you can afford to bail everyone out, go for it. If someone cannot pay their mortgage why should they keep the house? If I don't pay my rent, I'll be out on the street. I know that. I don't expect someone to bail me out. What is your problem?

This is about personal responsibility. Tragedy happens. To lots of people. Because liberals bailed out companies, against the wishes of taxpayers, do you believe that taxpayers should also have to pay other peoples mortgages?!

64 posted on 08/15/2010 1:09:37 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Since we "must pay" and do the "conservative" thing, why is it conservative and ethical to pay the debts and bail out others that have clearly lied and committed fraud while threatening our entire economic survival?

Do you feel it's conservative to pay the crooks and frauds that created this epic economic disaster as we're forced to bail them out?

Are you suggesting aiding and abetting and going along with two sets of rules and ethics is the conservative thing to do?

Take your time here.

65 posted on 08/15/2010 1:23:16 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
Since we "must pay" and do the "conservative" thing, why is it conservative and ethical to pay the debts and bail out others that have clearly lied and committed fraud while threatening our entire economic survival?

You think that it's the conservative view to get taxpayers to pay these peoples mortgage?

66 posted on 08/15/2010 1:28:31 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Because liberals bailed out companies

You again seem confused...It was under Bush when the bailouts first started...And it's not just the liberals bailing them out, its you, me and our kids in future generations.

67 posted on 08/15/2010 1:29:49 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Are you suggesting aiding and abetting and going along with two sets of rules and ethics is the conservative thing to do?

Why don't you answer any of the questions?

68 posted on 08/15/2010 1:30:53 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
You troll threads looking for a fight. I'm not going to oblige you.

This thread is about a couple that was brutalized by police when they refused to leave their foreclosed home. You want to change the subject and start a fight. You've tried that with me before. It won't work this time either.

69 posted on 08/15/2010 1:32:45 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
You think that it's the conservative view to get taxpayers to pay these peoples mortgage?

lol...

It's a conservative view to mind your own business, and not be foreced to bail out fatcorps and banksters...

Any other ridicules questions?

70 posted on 08/15/2010 1:33:50 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
You haven't answered any questions. I have given my opinion starting with post 27 that you have ignored.

Go pick a fight elsewhere. I'm not interested.

71 posted on 08/15/2010 1:34:12 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Are you suggesting aiding and abetting and going along with two sets of rules and ethics is the conservative thing to do?

Why don't you answer any of the questions?

You troll threads looking for a fight. I'm not going to oblige you.

LOL!

72 posted on 08/15/2010 1:35:24 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
You haven't answered any questions. I have given my opinion starting with post 27 that you have ignored.

OK, you said fatcorps and banksters shouldn't be bailed out by the tax paying homeowners.....OK.

BUT THEY ARE!!

lol....

If Joe and Jane tax payer pay their mortgage, should the banksters and fat corps be forced to return the the trillions in bail out money they took from the tax payers?

lol...

Ya can't have it both ways!!

73 posted on 08/15/2010 1:39:11 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
If Joe and Jane tax payer pay their mortgage, should the banksters and fat corps be forced to return the the trillions in bail out money they took from the tax payers?

Then you run right out and tell the banks to give it back, ok?

Have a nice day.

74 posted on 08/15/2010 1:43:21 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Your either a fraud, and some kind of weirdo playing conservative.

On one hand it seems you supports two sets of rules...one for the fat super wealthy guys and banksters, and one for the peon tax payers. Anyone bringing up this obvious conflict is considered, "Childish" as you stated up-thread.

On one hand you demand the little guys pay up, hand it all over or hit the streets. On the other hand you clearly implied it's childish to expect professional ethics and standards from the banksters and fat corps as we bail their unethical corruption out to the tune of trillions...

You call this this conservative thinking?

75 posted on 08/15/2010 1:58:42 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
It's a dreary task arguing with people who think it's fine and dandy for Goldman Sachs, AIG, Wells Fargo, Citi, JP Morgan, etc. to ransack the country while at the same time seem to enjoy having a laugh over jack-booted thugs to taser an old lady. Some going so far as to suggest using real guns!

I started this FR Thread earlier that didn't get much exposure.

"A group of nuns from Ireland are suing Morgan Stanley, alleging improper actions by the investment bank that led them to lose at least 5 million euros ($6.4 million), about 80 percent of their total investment, a filing by Stuarts Law showed. The claim, titled "The Sisters of Jesus and Mary versus Morgan Stanley", is related to bond investments linked to Dresdner Bank debt. The filing claims Morgan Stanley’s [MS 25.90 -0.22 (-0.84%) ] Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) Saturn's Investment Europe "deliberately or carelessly failed to redeem the notes" following their downgrading in January 2009. According to the filing, The Sisters of Charity of Jesus and Mary claim the SPV then waited until the price of the bond had risen in June 2009 to redeem the note and securing "Morgan Stanley a profit of at least $11.2 million … by way of a termination of payment." The nuns are seeking damages of 15 million euros. Morgan Stanley declined to comment on the case."

76 posted on 08/15/2010 2:32:09 PM PDT by Chunga85 ("Foreclosure Fraud", TARP, "Mortgage Crisis", Bailout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Well stated. There’s a lot of confusion goin’ on out there since the government has adopted the too big to fails and hooked them up with the US Treasury.


77 posted on 08/15/2010 2:41:14 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

I have seen all 75 post and no-one is asking the Why?

Why the foreclosures are happening.

They are happening because their is corruption in the system...we have a major system failure.

The banks own the system...it has been set-up that way.

If you or your landlords’ mortgage(s) are from a Servicer, it was most likely traded on Wall St and is based in Fraud.

UCC 3-501

Ask the lender to PROVE UP THE NOTE.

You will be interested to know the outcome I am sure.

PS...NOT all Mortgages are BAD, but, any involved in any form w/ JPMorgan/Stanley/Chase, Wells Fargo, Countrywide, Argent, Ameriquest and a host of others need to be reviewed for FRAUD.

Yes FRAUD


78 posted on 08/15/2010 2:42:24 PM PDT by American Bulldog777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
Time to dust off this Oldie but Goodie.

How Main Street has Destroyed Wall Street

I guess now would be a good time to shoot the greedy homeowners.

It’s crystal clear. From the very beginning the homeowners have gamed the system. They started by tricking the property appraiser (lender’s agent) into submitting an outcome-based appraisal.

Then, millions of homeowners shrewdly conned the “lenders” into dismissing all agency and fiduciary responsibility in the underwriting process….going so far as to force the “lenders” into forging documents.

Then, the greedy homeowners forced the “lenders” to securitize the loan in such a fashion as to bifurcate the mortgage from the note.

On top of that, the homeowners secretly cooked up the concept of “Credit Default Swaps” and forced the “lenders” to insure the collateral at the full (outcome based) value 30X over.

Having successfully pulled the wool over everyone’s eyes – these irresponsible homeowners showered themselves with well deserved bonuses.

Realizing they were too big to fail, these irresponsible, reckless homeowners lined the pockets of legislators and received enormous sums of taxpayer bailouts.

The result of these cunning maneuvers by the fraudulent homeowner scheme has them sitting fat and happy in the cat birds seat. Yup, that’s how they did it. And they’re getting away with it.

Savings drained – check, 401ks all gone – check. Kicked out of their homes – check. “Lenders” made whole many times over via Credit Default Swaps – check. Homeowners foreclosed and “lender” buys back property for pennies on the dollar – check.

Follow the money and you’ll find the culprit. It’s about time we hold these homeowners accountable.

Good call. The websites below are sponsored by a well-healed, politically connected, PR machine of greedy volunteers… and contain detailed information on how the collusion on Main Street has ripped off Wall Street.

Don’t look though… it’s just spam.

Foreclosure Hamlet

4closurefraud

79 posted on 08/15/2010 2:45:54 PM PDT by Chunga85 ("Foreclosure Fraud", TARP, "Mortgage Crisis", Bailout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
For those of you in Rio Linda here is a video that sums up the fraud quite nicely.

FRAUD

It's almost ten minutes long so try to pay attention.

80 posted on 08/15/2010 2:52:58 PM PDT by Chunga85 ("Foreclosure Fraud", TARP, "Mortgage Crisis", Bailout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson