Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RFEngineer
It takes two to disagree.

It would appear you agree with my position now as you no longer address it -instead addressing me -claiming I am being dramatic and ignoring the truth.

Your arguments have been soundly put down as will the arguments of the rogue judge in this case...

One can not argue against that which is irrelevant -the very fact that ones argues against it implies its very relevance... That is the truth you ignore albeit only passively now...

803 posted on 08/16/2010 5:06:48 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 799 | View Replies ]


To: DBeers

“One can not argue against that which is irrelevant -the very fact that ones argues against it implies its very relevance... That is the truth you ignore albeit only passively now... “

You are uncommonly stupid.

I don’t know where you get the arguments you attribute to me, but let me be clear: You made them up, not me.

I am not “ignoring passively” I am getting in your face and pointing at your nose and telling you to put up or shut up.

Where did you find the arguments that you attribute to me? If you have a specific post that says what you claim I said, post it.

You simply do not understand the point I was making, and I grow tired of trying to explain it to you. You don’t get it. I accept that. Now, will you post exactly what I said and argue against it (I know whatever I say, you will argue against it....that’s become clear)

Otherwise go away. You are annoying and fake. I have no time for your games.


805 posted on 08/16/2010 5:26:35 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 803 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson