coorect that.....”marriage was meant to regulate HETEROSEXUALIY as a potential destructive force”....whereas homosexuality was to be banned as ONLY a destructive force....if people want us to change the law and persuade us otherwise, then fine...but judicial coercion is wrong....
and why not just have NO marriage....It seems to me that courts could say “either everytbody gets married or nobody does”, thus they strike down marriage laws and nobody can.....at least that leaves it to the people instead of having judges abuse their power and just change the definition of marriage....
They already left it to the people in Prop 8, the people voted against the gay agenda.
By the way...this is Beowulf’s husband, not Beowulf...she doesn’t want me writing on her forum without a disclaimer....