Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cycle of discernment

that would mean his scotus picks are invalid correct??


15 posted on 08/13/2010 4:58:10 AM PDT by lonster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Nailbiter

ping


17 posted on 08/13/2010 5:08:02 AM PDT by IncPen (How can a man who won't produce his own documentation lecture the rest of us on immigration?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: lonster
If the Kenyan were to be removed for lack of citizenship, all his accomplishments would stand until repealed formally. Legality or constitutionality would not apply. For the Repubnlicans, 90% of them, Ơbamacare cannot be repealed no matter its or the Kenyan's legality because so many new bureaucrats have already been hired and the Republicans will not vote for any measure that would cause masses of bureaucrats to lose their jobs. Scotus picks? Who is going to judge them? I don't expect a series of duels among the justices.
24 posted on 08/13/2010 5:28:57 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: lonster

That would seem correct to me. They’d have to be “un-appointed” from the court, and it would seem that the two vacancies would have to be filled by his successor in office...


48 posted on 08/13/2010 6:06:46 AM PDT by OKSooner (Mohammed is gay.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: lonster
"that would mean his scotus picks are invalid correct??"

That is the real question. Lets us say Obama resigns because he is pressured to do so after it is discovered he is in fact not a natural born citizen. (Not saying this is true just pondering the results of such) The Constitution has no section dealing with undoing the legislation and appointments an illegitimate President made while in office.

It would be an all out Circus and full of conundrums. Normally the SCOTUS would rule on such things once Congress passed legislation that dealt with it or a case was brought in the lower courts seeking redress of Obama's action while being an illegitimate POTUS. How would the SCOTUS rule being they have now 2 people on the court appointed by Obama.

This mess would go on for years with the Republicans and Democrats continually battling over the outcome. Which makes me wonder (if indeed Obama isn't eligible) if this was not part of the plan all along!

50 posted on 08/13/2010 6:08:05 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: lonster

Yes and every other Bill he has signed.


71 posted on 08/13/2010 8:58:10 AM PDT by troy McClure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson