The fact that a single gay judge was allowed to hear this case and overturn the will of the people is far more disturbing than the poster’s use of the word queer.
Indeed.
There is still no scientific evidence homosexuals are born with their same-sex attraction and plenty of evidence same-sex attraction has environmental roots. Yet we have a judge who by all means appears to be mentally confused making decisions affecting the entire state of California and perhaps beyond California's borders.
>>> The fact that a single gay judge was allowed to hear this case and overturn the will of the people is far more disturbing than the poster’s use of the word queer
I understand your point but what would you have said to a gay man who would make the same objection if a heterosexual federal judge had upheld the ban? Would you have called him a fool ? Done a WAAAHHHH WAHHH post ?
There are more important issues to argue here. Crude name calling, not so much.