Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NRA Statement on endorsement of Chet Edwards (D-TX)
NRA-ILA ^ | 8/12/2010 | Kaelan Jones

Posted on 08/12/2010 7:48:35 AM PDT by Joe Brower

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 08/12/2010 7:48:39 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

The NRA has falled to radicals. I’m cancelling my membership - something that would have been unthinkable 2 years ago.


2 posted on 08/12/2010 7:51:09 AM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Change that to “fallen.” ;0


3 posted on 08/12/2010 7:51:38 AM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

I am done with the NRA. They were thrilled with Hairy Reed’s $70 million gun range in Nevada that could have been built for $1 million. It is a pure pork barrel real estate scam that Hairy Reed is know for. The NRA sucks now.


4 posted on 08/12/2010 7:52:10 AM PDT by Frantzie (Television controls the American people/sheep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Edwards was allowed to vote the NRA position on legislation that was going to pass with or without his vote to help keep the Democrats in control of the House of Representatives.

If the GOP had solid control over the House, I could see this endorsement; but not now.

And how did this guy vote on TARP?


5 posted on 08/12/2010 7:52:51 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; wku man; SLB; ...
As promised, here is the response I just received from the NRA about my inquiry into why they are endorsing Chet Edwards in TX. I'm not supporting a democrat here, but merely passing on the information that was sent to me.

It would be helpful to also know what Edwards' opponents pros & cons are, and I have emailed the NRA back telling them this, in addition to letting them know that they need to publish this information on their website and through press releases 1/2 second after making their endorsements, so that the rumor mill doesn't immediately go ballistic.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

6 posted on 08/12/2010 7:53:15 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Maybe the NRA should realize that whatever party controls the House dictates the overall agenda.

Supporting a Democrat that may be pro-gun is useless if it serves to keep Nancy Pelosi in power and in charge of the overall House agenda.

Idiots.


7 posted on 08/12/2010 7:54:19 AM PDT by headstamp 2 ("My Boss is a Jewish Carpenter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
Yes, Frantzie, I think everyone here is very familiar with your viewpoints -- you repeat them often enough.
8 posted on 08/12/2010 7:54:19 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2
"Maybe the NRA should realize that whatever party controls the House dictates the overall agenda."

Come on -- you think they don't know this?

Maybe you should call the NRA and ask them yourself what their reasoning is, rather than act on your assumptions as fact.

That's what I did.

9 posted on 08/12/2010 7:56:27 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

The Second was meant to be the last resort of the people in checking a government over-reaching its authority;being “allowed” firearms while at the same time forced to abide by government restrictions and rules on every other aspect of one’s life is meaningless.


10 posted on 08/12/2010 7:58:28 AM PDT by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

There are NO good democrats.

There are plenty of terrible republicans but not a single good democrat. That was confirmed during the health crimes disaster.

WTH has happened to the NRA?


11 posted on 08/12/2010 7:58:33 AM PDT by jazminerose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
Once again conservative money and muscle are being put behind a liberal candidate (American Conservative Union rating of 16 out of 100 for 2009).

The NRA outsmarts itself with its Machiavellian tactics.

12 posted on 08/12/2010 7:59:15 AM PDT by Monterrosa-24 (...even more American than a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

This illustrates why it’s so important for conservative voters not to be endorsement-driven. It is essential that we vote with our heads, not with our “loyalties”.

There’s nothing wrong with supporting the NRA in terms of the lobbying work they do.

But to take their lead in who to vote for... that’s pure folly.


13 posted on 08/12/2010 8:03:47 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazminerose

At the time of Klinton’s first election, approx. 1/3 of NRA members were Republican, 1/3 Democrat, and 1/3 Independent.
That has changed considerably into a much more Republican base. But NRA still focuses on Second Amendment issues. Nothing to do with TARP. Obi-care,etc.


14 posted on 08/12/2010 8:03:58 AM PDT by donozark (It's hard to afford a psychiatrist when you work at a gas station.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
TARP is not part of the NRA’s politics, and the NRA is not an arm of the GOP (or vice versa). It is NRA policy to always endorse the incumbent if he has been sufficiently “gun-owner friendly” during his recent terms.
Moreover, if they stopped doing so, it might be ammunition to force a change their non-profit status.
I don't agree with this, but I understand it.
15 posted on 08/12/2010 8:05:19 AM PDT by Little Ray (The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Monterrosa-24

Here in Illinois, once you get south of I-80, the political complexion of the state changes dramatically. The downstate Democrats are much different that their Chicago-bred counterparts. They tend to be much more conservative and tend to be pro-gun. Having a “D” in back of one’s name as an Illinois politician isn’t quite the “kiss of death’ that one might think. These downstate Democrats are one reason that Illinois doesn’t have even more obnoxious gun laws than we do. Oh, in this state, having an “R” in back of one’s name ain’t no gaurantee, either.


16 posted on 08/12/2010 8:05:29 AM PDT by JayVee (Joseph)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

What good is protecting 2nd amendment rights if we are all forced to rely on Government healthcare and Government employment?

What good is a gun when one will never use it against ones benefactors?

The commies don’t need to worry about taking your guns when they know you need them to care for your children’s health and livelihoods!


17 posted on 08/12/2010 8:05:29 AM PDT by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
"This illustrates why it’s so important for conservative voters not to be endorsement-driven"

You've got that right. I told the fellow at the NRA that this sort of thing is why I don't donate to their PVF, but only directly to specific candidates. To his credit, the fellow wholeheartedly agreed with me.

18 posted on 08/12/2010 8:06:54 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

>>[the NRA needs] to publish this information on their website and through press releases 1/2 second after making their endorsements, so that the rumor mill doesn’t immediately go ballistic.

Huge 2nd on that.

Their website sucks. I ought to be able to go there and easily verify claims of NRA endorsements for various candidates, and I cannot.


19 posted on 08/12/2010 8:10:11 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (No Representation without Taxation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazminerose

“There are NO good democrats.” I hesitate to go so far as you in saying that there are no good democrats, but I will say that some democrats are far, far worse than others. I don’t think Chet Edwards is actually too bad as far as democrats go, and he did vote against the healthcare bill, but he still voted for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House, and presumably he would do so again, and that alone is reason enough to vote him out and replace him with a republican.


20 posted on 08/12/2010 8:11:08 AM PDT by Texan Tory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson