Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dubya-M-Dees
55% of media coverage has been positive.

I wonder what Bush's percent of positive media coverage was. The media is dialing back on the Obama propaganda because it causes major losses in viewership.

32 posted on 08/11/2010 6:31:57 AM PDT by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Reeses
55% of media coverage has been positive.

I wonder what Bush's percent of positive media coverage was. The media is dialing back on the Obama propaganda because it causes major losses in viewership.

I think you'd have to stretch and exaggerate and parse every phrase to find even two or three weeks of the whole 8 years of the Bush Presidency to find even 10% positive media coverage.

48 posted on 08/11/2010 6:36:43 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson